These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30475089)

  • 1. The differential similarity of positive and negative information - an affect-induced processing outcome?
    Alves H; Koch A; Unkelbach C
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Sep; 33(6):1224-1238. PubMed ID: 30475089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad.
    Koch A; Alves H; Krüger T; Unkelbach C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1171-92. PubMed ID: 26866655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why Good Is More Alike Than Bad: Processing Implications.
    Alves H; Koch A; Unkelbach C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2017 Feb; 21(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 28063663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Verbal makes it positive, spatial makes it negative: working memory biases judgments, attention, and moods.
    Storbeck J; Watson P
    Emotion; 2014 Dec; 14(6):1072-86. PubMed ID: 24999914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A density explanation of valence asymmetries in recognition memory.
    Alves H; Unkelbach C; Burghardt J; Koch AS; Krüger T; Becker VD
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):896-909. PubMed ID: 25772462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Fluency Amplification Model: fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations.
    Albrecht S; Carbon CC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():195-203. PubMed ID: 24603044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negativity bias in attribution of external agency.
    Morewedge CK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):535-45. PubMed ID: 19883135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spontaneous evaluative inferences and their relationship to spontaneous trait inferences.
    Schneid ED; Carlston DE; Skowronski JJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 May; 108(5):681-96. PubMed ID: 25915135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The modulation of the evaluative priming effect by phasic affect.
    Lemonnier A; Alexopoulos T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():94-103. PubMed ID: 30465938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-dependent evaluative processing of moral and emotional content during comprehension: An ERP study.
    Kunkel A; Filik R; Mackenzie IG; Leuthold H
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 18(2):389-409. PubMed ID: 29512030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought.
    Clore GL; Huntsinger JR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Sep; 11(9):393-9. PubMed ID: 17698405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence that photos promote rosiness for claims about the future.
    Newman EJ; Azad T; Lindsay DS; Garry M
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1223-1233. PubMed ID: 27645614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Affective orientation influences memory for emotional and neutral words.
    Greenberg SN; Tokarev J; Estes Z
    Am J Psychol; 2012; 125(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 22428427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Affective habituation: subliminal exposure to extreme stimuli decreases their extremity.
    Dijksterhuis A; Smith PK
    Emotion; 2002 Sep; 2(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 12899354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of negative emotion on deductive reasoning: examining the contribution of physiological arousal.
    Blanchette I; Leese J
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 21106478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contextual influences on implicit evaluation: a test of additive versus contrastive effects of evaluative context stimuli in affective priming.
    Gawronski B; Deutsch R; Seidel O
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1226-36. PubMed ID: 16055642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of unilateral motor behaviors on the judgment of valenced stimuli.
    Dru V; Cretenet J
    Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 18472041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive complexity explains processing asymmetry in judgments of similarity versus difference.
    Ichien N; Lin N; Holyoak KJ; Lu H
    Cogn Psychol; 2024 Jun; 151():101661. PubMed ID: 38663330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations.
    Ito TA; Larsen JT; Smith NK; Cacioppo JT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Oct; 75(4):887-900. PubMed ID: 9825526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Approach and avoidance: the influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information.
    Neumann R; Strack F
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Jul; 79(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10909876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.