These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30475647)

  • 1. Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction: A randomized prospective clinical trial.
    Schneider PP; Gandini Júnior LG; Monini ADC; Pinto ADS; Kim KB
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):190-199. PubMed ID: 30475647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which one closes extraction spaces faster: en masse retraction or two-step retraction?
    Schneider PP; Kim KB; da Costa Monini A; Dos Santos-Pinto A; Gandini LG
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Nov; 89(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 31259616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Friction versus frictionless mechanics during maxillary en-masse retraction in adult patients with Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a randomized clinical trial.
    Magdi S; Abdelsayed FA; Aboulfotouh MH; Fahim FH
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 39011819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Monga N; Kharbanda OP; Samrit V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):274-82. PubMed ID: 27476360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. En masse retraction and two-step retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in adult Class I women. A comparison of anchorage loss.
    Heo W; Nahm DS; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):973-8. PubMed ID: 18004930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
    Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rate and anchorage loss during en-masse retraction between friction and frictionless mechanics: A randomized clinical trial.
    Sardana R; Chugh VK; Bhatia NK; Shastri D; Moungkhom P; Kumar P; Chugh A; Singh S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 36919990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apical root resorption in orthodontic patients with en-masse maxillary anterior retraction and intrusion with miniscrews.
    Liou EJ; Chang PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20152676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Khlef HN; Hajeer MY; Ajaj MA; Heshmeh O
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jan; 20(1):113-127. PubMed ID: 31058623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective comparative study between differential moments and miniscrews in anchorage control.
    Davoody AR; Posada L; Utreja A; Janakiraman N; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Oct; 35(5):568-76. PubMed ID: 22898749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alveolar cortical plate changes associated with incisor retraction and its influence on the limits of orthodontic tooth movement.
    Elnagar MH; Handelman CS; Lippincott JS; Kim MR; BeGole E
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Nov; 24(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 33475228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: A single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Khlef HN; Hajeer MY; Ajaj MA; Heshmeh O; Youssef N; Mahaini L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):e111-e120. PubMed ID: 33158633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional volumetric evaluation of root resorption in maxillary anteriors following en-masse retraction with varying force vectors - a randomized control trial.
    Prasanna Arvind TR; Ramasamy N; Subramanian AK; Selvaraj A; Siva S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Apr; 27(2):211-219. PubMed ID: 37553952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
    Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of platelet-rich plasma on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
    Chandak S; Patil AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jul; 162(1):e28-e34. PubMed ID: 35473999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.