These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30476450)
1. Unexpected Abnormal Uptake in the Breasts at Dedicated Breast PET: Incidentally Detected Small Cancers or Nonmalignant Features? Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Omiya Y; Onishi H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):443-449. PubMed ID: 30476450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between ring-type dedicated breast PET and immune microenvironment in early breast cancer. Sasada S; Shiroma N; Goda N; Kajitani K; Emi A; Masumoto N; Kadoya T; Arihiro K; Okada M Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Oct; 177(3):651-657. PubMed ID: 31267329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by Dual Time Point [ Garcia-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Pérez-García VM; Molina D; Jiménez-Londoño GA; Soriano-Castrejón A; Martínez-González A Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Aug; 19(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 27981471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Higher breast cancer conspicuity on dbPET compared to WB-PET/CT. Nishimatsu K; Nakamoto Y; Miyake KK; Ishimori T; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():138-145. PubMed ID: 28583624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FDG Avidity and Tumor Burden: Survival Outcomes for Patients With Recurrent Breast Cancer. Taghipour M; Wray R; Sheikhbahaei S; Wright JL; Subramaniam RM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):846-55. PubMed ID: 27003053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intratumoral heterogeneity on dedicated breast positron emission tomography predicts malignancy grade of breast cancer. Masumoto N; Kadoya T; Sasada S; Emi A; Arihiro K; Okada M Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Sep; 171(2):315-323. PubMed ID: 29779072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The relationship between (18)F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features of breast cancer]. Tang B; Zhang Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Li TR; Ding CY Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 39(4):280-285. PubMed ID: 28550668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Diwanji D; Onishi N; Hathi DK; Lawhn-Heath C; Kornak J; Li W; Guo R; Molina-Vega J; Seo Y; Flavell RR; Heditsian D; Brain S; Esserman LJ; Joe BN; Hylton NM; Jones EF; Ray KM Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230082. PubMed ID: 38551406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Performance of the Support Vector Machine Model for Breast Cancer on Ring-Shaped Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography Images. Satoh Y; Tamada D; Omiya Y; Onishi H; Motosugi U J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(3):413-418. PubMed ID: 32345809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dedicated breast PET for detecting residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: A prospective cohort study. Sasada S; Masumoto N; Goda N; Kajitani K; Emi A; Kadoya T; Okada M Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 44(4):444-448. PubMed ID: 29396328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification of Abnormal Findings on Ring-type Dedicated Breast PET for the Detection of Breast Cancer. Sasada S; Masumoto N; Kimura Y; Emi A; Kadoya T; Okada M Anticancer Res; 2020 Jun; 40(6):3491-3497. PubMed ID: 32487649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Kim JW; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(9):1353-61. PubMed ID: 26067088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in salivary gland carcinomas. Ryu IS; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23670902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Malignant prediction of incidental findings using ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography. Sasada S; Masumoto N; Emi A; Kadoya T; Okada M Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):1144. PubMed ID: 35064184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Volume, as Determined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as a Prognostic Factor of Outcome for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Distant Metastasis. Son SH; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Song BI; Chae YS; Ahn BC; Lee J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 26204115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distribution pattern of FDG uptake using ring-type dedicated breast PET in comparison to whole-body PET/CT scanning in invasive breast cancer. Sakaguchi R; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Miyake KK; Nakamoto Y; Sugie T; Toi M; Mikami Y; Togashi K Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Aug; 33(8):570-578. PubMed ID: 31115856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies. Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]