275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30477032)
1. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T
J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kuroki LM; Mullen MM; Massad LS; Wu N; Liu J; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann AR; Thaker PH; McCourt CK; Novetsky AP
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28594761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Mackeen AD; Khalifeh A; Fleisher J; Vogell A; Han C; Sendecki J; Pettker C; Leiby BE; Baxter JK; Sfakianaki A; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 24807325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
Fitzwater JL; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Tita AT
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suture Compared With Staple Closure of Skin Incision for High-Order Cesarean Deliveries.
Fox NS; Melka S; Miller J; Bender S; Silverstein M; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 131(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 29420412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery.
Temming LA; Raghuraman N; Carter EB; Stout MJ; Rampersad RM; Macones GA; Cahill AG; Tuuli MG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):449.e1-449.e9. PubMed ID: 28601567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
