276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30477032)
21. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Skin closure of pfannenstiel incision with dermabond, staples, or suture during cesarean delivery: experience of a single attending.
Siddiqui DS; Lacuna EM; Chen HY; Chauhan SP
Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 22875661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mackeen AD; Sullivan MV; Schuster M; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tuuli MG; Rampersad RM; Carbone JF; Stamilio D; Macones GA; Odibo AO
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):682-690. PubMed ID: 21343772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery.
Feese CA; Johnson S; Jones E; Lambers DS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):556.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23921089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty].
Hlubek R; Walder P; Káňa J; Salounová D
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clay FS; Walsh CA; Walsh SR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery: is there a clinical difference?
Daniilidis K; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Ettinger S; Claassen L; Plaass C; Lerch M; Waizy H; Martinelli N; Yao D
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Aug; 104(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 31055725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y
Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial.
Sharma C; Sharma S; Soni A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Feb; 6(2):101256. PubMed ID: 38109995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Open Liver Resection: A Randomised Clinical Trial.
Matsuno Y; Yamazaki S; Mitsuka Y; Abe H; Moriguchi M; Higaki T; Takayama T
World J Surg; 2021 Feb; 45(2):571-580. PubMed ID: 33104835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Incidence of wound complications after cesarean delivery: is suture closure better?
Tierney N; LaCoursiere DY; Hebert S; Kelly TF; Lukacz ES
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(16):1992-1996. PubMed ID: 27801606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis.
Smith TO; Sexton D; Mann C; Donell S
BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1199. PubMed ID: 20234041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Tsujinaka T; Yamamoto K; Fujita J; Endo S; Kawada J; Nakahira S; Shimokawa T; Kobayashi S; Yamasaki M; Akamaru Y; Miyamoto A; Mizushima T; Shimizu J; Umeshita K; Ito T; Doki Y; Mori M;
Lancet; 2013 Sep; 382(9898):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24075050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomized clinical trial of skin closure by subcuticular suture or skin stapling after elective colorectal cancer surgery.
Kobayashi S; Ito M; Yamamoto S; Kinugasa Y; Kotake M; Saida Y; Kobatake T; Yamanaka T; Saito N; Moriya Y
Br J Surg; 2015 Apr; 102(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 25727933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery.
Ramsey PS; White AM; Guinn DA; Lu GC; Ramin SM; Davies JK; Neely CL; Newby C; Fonseca L; Case AS; Kaslow RA; Kirby RS; Rouse DJ; Hauth JC
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):967-73. PubMed ID: 15863532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of subcutaneous closure in preventing wound complications after cesarean delivery with Pfannenstiel incision: a randomized clinical trial.
Corbacioglu Esmer A; Goksedef PC; Akca A; Akbayir O; Dagdeviren H; Turan GY; Yarsilikal F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Mar; 40(3):728-35. PubMed ID: 24738117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Risk factors for wound disruption following cesarean delivery.
Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Owen J; Tita AT
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Aug; 27(12):1237-40. PubMed ID: 24090116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparing wound complication rates following closure of hip wounds with metallic skin staples or subcuticular vicryl suture: a prospective randomised trial.
Shetty AA; Kumar VS; Morgan-Hough C; Georgeu GA; James KD; Nicholl JE
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2004 Dec; 12(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 15621905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
