2059 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30477981)
1. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3-T Multiparametric MRI Followed by In-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.
Hosseiny M; Shakeri S; Felker ER; Lu D; Sayre J; Ahuja P; Raman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 32755166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Porpiglia F; Manfredi M; Mele F; Cossu M; Bollito E; Veltri A; Cirillo S; Regge D; Faletti R; Passera R; Fiori C; De Luca S
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):282-288. PubMed ID: 27574821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men.
Hendriks RJ; van der Leest MMG; Israël B; Hannink G; YantiSetiasti A; Cornel EB; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Klaver OS; Sedelaar JPM; Van Criekinge W; de Jong H; Mulders PFA; Crawford ED; Veltman J; Schalken JA; Barentsz JO; van Oort IM
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Dec; 24(4):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 33941866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?
Schouten MG; van der Leest M; Pokorny M; Hoogenboom M; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 28063613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate.
Costa DN; Goldberg K; Leon AD; Lotan Y; Xi Y; Aziz M; Freifeld Y; Margulis V; Raj G; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Desai N; Bagrodia A; Francis F; Pedrosa I; Cadeddu JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Jul; 2(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 31277776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
