265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30478355)
1. Interpersonal Variations in Gut Microbiota Profiles Supersedes the Effects of Differing Fecal Storage Conditions.
Bundgaard-Nielsen C; Hagstrøm S; Sørensen S
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17367. PubMed ID: 30478355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.
Ribeiro RM; Souza-Basqueira M; Oliveira LC; Salles FC; Pereira NB; Sabino EC
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2018 Nov; 60():e77. PubMed ID: 30517247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of the fecal microbiota using high-throughput sequencing reveals a stable microbial community during storage.
Carroll IM; Ringel-Kulka T; Siddle JP; Klaenhammer TR; Ringel Y
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46953. PubMed ID: 23071673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.
Choo JM; Leong LE; Rogers GB
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16350. PubMed ID: 26572876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fecal microbiome composition and diversity of cryopreserved canine stool at different duration and storage conditions.
Barko P; Nguyen-Edquilang J; Williams DA; Gal A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0294730. PubMed ID: 38324560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples.
Rounge TB; Meisal R; Nordby JI; Ambur OH; de Lange T; Hoff G
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 30409123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of time and temperature on gut microbiota and SCFA composition in stool samples.
Cunningham JL; Bramstång L; Singh A; Jayarathna S; Rasmusson AJ; Moazzami A; Müller B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236944. PubMed ID: 32745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.
Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term stability of microbiome diversity and composition in fecal samples stored in eNAT medium.
Young RR; Jenkins K; Araujo-Perez F; Seed PC; Kelly MS
Microbiologyopen; 2020 Jul; 9(7):e1046. PubMed ID: 32390344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of sampling and storage on the fecal microbiota composition in healthy and diseased subjects.
Tedjo DI; Jonkers DM; Savelkoul PH; Masclee AA; van Best N; Pierik MJ; Penders J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126685. PubMed ID: 26024217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of storage temperature, storage time, and Cary-Blair transport medium on the stability of the gut microbiota.
Nagata N; Tohya M; Takeuchi F; Suda W; Nishijima S; Ohsugi M; Ueki K; Tsujimoto T; Nakamura T; Kawai T; Miyoshi-Akiyama T; Uemura N; Hattori M
Drug Discov Ther; 2019 Nov; 13(5):256-260. PubMed ID: 31611489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
