265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30478355)
21. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool.
Flores R; Shi J; Yu G; Ma B; Ravel J; Goedert JJ; Sinha R
Microbiome; 2015; 3():33. PubMed ID: 26269741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fecal Aliquot Straw Technique (FAST) allows for easy and reproducible subsampling: assessing interpersonal variation in trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) accumulation.
Romano KA; Dill-McFarland KA; Kasahara K; Kerby RL; Vivas EI; Amador-Noguez D; Herd P; Rey FE
Microbiome; 2018 May; 6(1):91. PubMed ID: 29776435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles.
Chen CC; Wu WK; Chang CM; Panyod S; Lu TP; Liou JM; Fang YJ; Chuang EY; Wu MS
J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Dec; 119(12):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 32111519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of short-term room temperature storage on the microbial community in infant fecal samples.
Guo Y; Li SH; Kuang YS; He JR; Lu JH; Luo BJ; Jiang FJ; Liu YZ; Papasian CJ; Xia HM; Deng HW; Qiu X
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():26648. PubMed ID: 27226242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rapidly Processed Stool Swabs Approximate Stool Microbiota Profiles.
Bokulich NA; Maldonado J; Kang DW; Krajmalnik-Brown R; Caporaso JG
mSphere; 2019 Apr; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 30971445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gut microbiome comparability of fresh-frozen versus stabilized-frozen samples from hospitalized patients using 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
Ilett EE; Jørgensen M; Noguera-Julian M; Daugaard G; Murray DD; Helleberg M; Paredes R; Lundgren J; Sengeløv H; MacPherson C
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13351. PubMed ID: 31527823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags.
Wu GD; Lewis JD; Hoffmann C; Chen YY; Knight R; Bittinger K; Hwang J; Chen J; Berkowsky R; Nessel L; Li H; Bushman FD
BMC Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 10():206. PubMed ID: 20673359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of field conditions on fecal microbiota.
Hale VL; Tan CL; Niu K; Yang Y; Cui D; Zhao H; Knight R; Amato KR
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():180-188. PubMed ID: 27686380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A novel affordable reagent for room temperature storage and transport of fecal samples for metagenomic analyses.
Han M; Hao L; Lin Y; Li F; Wang J; Yang H; Xiao L; Kristiansen K; Jia H; Li J
Microbiome; 2018 Feb; 6(1):43. PubMed ID: 29482661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples.
Kim JH; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Ha N; Kim JK; Moon SJ; Kim MG
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):114. PubMed ID: 36596832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative methods for fecal sample storage to preserve gut microbial structure and function in an in vitro model of the human colon.
Deschamps C; Fournier E; Uriot O; Lajoie F; Verdier C; Comtet-Marre S; Thomas M; Kapel N; Cherbuy C; Alric M; Almeida M; Etienne-Mesmin L; Blanquet-Diot S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 104(23):10233-10247. PubMed ID: 33085024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile.
Chiu O; Gomez DE; Obrego D; Dunfield K; MacNicol JL; Liversidge B; Verbrugghe A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0292731. PubMed ID: 38285680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of preservation method on canine (
Horng KR; Ganz HH; Eisen JA; Marks SL
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4827. PubMed ID: 29844978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ionic liquid-based reagents improve the stability of midterm fecal sample storage.
Hao L; Xia Z; Yang H; Wang J; Han M
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():68-73. PubMed ID: 28506638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of storage temperature and flash-freezing on salivary microbiota profiles based on 16S rRNA-targeted sequencing.
Furuhashi H; Takayasu L; Isshi K; Hara Y; Ono S; Kato M; Sumiyama K; Suda W
Eur J Oral Sci; 2022 Apr; 130(2):e12852. PubMed ID: 35049092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room?
Shaw AG; Sim K; Powell E; Cornwell E; Cramer T; McClure ZE; Li MS; Kroll JS
Microbiome; 2016 Jul; 4(1):40. PubMed ID: 27473284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
