These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30478738)

  • 1. Is There an Orthographic Boost for Ambiguous Words During Their Processing?
    Haro J; Comesaña M; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):519-534. PubMed ID: 30478738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.
    Piercey CD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantic Ambiguity Effects in L2 Word Recognition.
    Ishida T
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):523-536. PubMed ID: 29168115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.
    Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16516169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing.
    Rice CA; Tokowicz N; Fraundorf SH; Liburd TL
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 31001796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Hino Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 12412895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
    Samson D; Pillon A
    Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: what is shared, what is different?
    Müller O; Duñabeitia JA; Carreiras M
    Psychophysiology; 2010 May; 47(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 20102534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-character Orthographic Similarity Effects on the Recognition of Chinese Coordinative Compound Words.
    Sun J; Zhao W; Pae HK
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2020 Feb; 49(1):125-145. PubMed ID: 31583601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological-orthographic consistency for Japanese words and its impact on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Miyamura S; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):126-146. PubMed ID: 27808550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotionality effects in ambiguous word recognition: The crucial role of the affective congruence between distinct meanings of ambiguous words.
    Ferré P; Haro J; Huete-Pérez D; Fraga I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 33438523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupillometric and behavioural evidence shows no differences between polyseme and homonym processing.
    Haro J; López-Cortés N; Ferré P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Aug; 238():103985. PubMed ID: 37453281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.
    Robert C; Rico Duarte L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 25680348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time course of semantic ambiguity in visual word recognition: behavioral and ERP evidence for the lexical-semantic effect.
    Kim J; Kim S; Nam K
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1378125. PubMed ID: 39045435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1999 Dec; 53(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 10646204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthographic neighborhood effects in recognition and recall tasks in a transparent orthography.
    Justi FR; Jaeger A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):565-578. PubMed ID: 27685021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tolerating ambiguity: ambiguous words recruit the left inferior frontal gyrus in absence of a behavioral effect.
    Hargreaves IS; Pexman PM; Pittman DJ; Goodyear BG
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 20382629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.