188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30480489)
1. Detection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Is Superior at Standard Radiation Dose CT versus Reduced Dose CT.
Jensen CT; Wagner-Bartak NA; Vu LN; Liu X; Raval B; Martinez D; Wei W; Cheng Y; Samei E; Gupta S
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):400-409. PubMed ID: 30480489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep learning imaging reconstruction of reduced-dose 40 keV virtual monoenergetic imaging for early detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Li S; Yuan L; Lu T; Yang X; Ren W; Wang L; Zhao J; Deng J; Liu X; Xue C; Sun Q; Zhang W; Zhou J
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111128. PubMed ID: 37816301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective Evaluation of Reduced Dose Computed Tomography for the Detection of Low-Contrast Liver Lesions: Direct Comparison with Concurrent Standard Dose Imaging.
Pooler BD; Lubner MG; Kim DH; Chen OT; Li K; Chen GH; Pickhardt PJ
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):2055-2066. PubMed ID: 27595834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduced-Dose Deep Learning Reconstruction for Abdominal CT of Liver Metastases.
Jensen CT; Gupta S; Saleh MM; Liu X; Wong VK; Salem U; Qiao W; Samei E; Wagner-Bartak NA
Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 35014900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
Padole A; Singh S; Lira D; Blake MA; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Choy G; Saini S; Do S; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
Volders D; Bols A; Haspeslagh M; Coenegrachts K
Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):469-74. PubMed ID: 23847252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Solomon J; Marin D; Roy Choudhury K; Patel B; Samei E
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):777-787. PubMed ID: 28170300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection for Detecting Hepatic Metastases on Submillisievert Low-Dose Computed Tomography.
Son JH; Kim SH; Yoon JH; Lee Y; Lim YJ; Kim SJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 28099224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise.
Shuman WP; Green DE; Busey JM; Kolokythas O; Mitsumori LM; Koprowicz KM; Thibault JB; Hsieh J; Alessio AM; Choi E; Kinahan PE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 23617492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraindividual comparison of diagnostic performance in patients with hepatic metastasis of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source abdominal computed tomography.
Park M; Chung YE; Lee HS; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ; Kim KW
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 24300843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm in ultralow-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: evaluation of radiation dose reduction, image quality, and diagnostic performance.
Park SB; Kim YS; Lee JB; Park HJ
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3137-46. PubMed ID: 26197735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions.
Goodenberger MH; Wagner-Bartak NA; Gupta S; Liu X; Yap RQ; Sun J; Tamm EP; Jensen CT
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 28806318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT: using a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dose reduction in a prospective clinical study.
Khawaja RDA; Singh S; Blake M; Harisinghani M; Choy G; Karosmangulu A; Padole A; Do S; Brown K; Thompson R; Morton T; Raihani N; Koehler T; Kalra MK
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25458225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective evaluation of prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) algorithm in abdominal CT: a comparison of reduced dose with standard dose imaging.
Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Tang J; del Rio AM; Chen GH
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):207-21. PubMed ID: 24943136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality comparison of two adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR, ASiR-V) algorithms and filtered back projection in routine liver CT.
Chen LH; Jin C; Li JY; Wang GL; Jia YJ; Duan HF; Pan N; Guo J
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1088):20170655. PubMed ID: 29848018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is it possible to use low-dose deep learning reconstruction for the detection of liver metastases on CT routinely?
Lyu P; Liu N; Harrawood B; Solomon J; Wang H; Chen Y; Rigiroli F; Ding Y; Schwartz FR; Jiang H; Lowry C; Wang L; Samei E; Gao J; Marin D
Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar; 33(3):1629-1640. PubMed ID: 36323984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
