These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30480832)
1. The Identity Objection to the future-like-ours argument. Brill S Bioethics; 2019 Feb; 33(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 30480832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's 'Future-Like-Ours' Argument. Reitan E Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 26424415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the Identity Objection to the future-like-ours argument succeed? Blackshaw BP Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):203-206. PubMed ID: 31769884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The parenthood argument. Simkulet W Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29171657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the 'future like ours' argument. Strong C J Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 38(9):567-9. PubMed ID: 22505733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism. Sauchelli A Bioethics; 2018 Mar; 32(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 29369389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The deprivation argument against abortion. Stretton D Bioethics; 2004 Apr; 18(2):144-80. PubMed ID: 15148946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A critique of "the best secular argument against abortion". Strong C J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):727-31. PubMed ID: 18827103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument. Hendricks P Bioethics; 2019 Feb; 33(2):245-253. PubMed ID: 30480820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A future like ours revisited. Brown MT J Med Ethics; 2002 Jun; 28(3):192-5; discussion 202. PubMed ID: 12042408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impairment Argument and Future-Like-Ours: A Problematic Dependence. Bobier C J Bioeth Inq; 2023 Sep; 20(3):353-357. PubMed ID: 37278912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate. Di Nucci E J Med Ethics; 2009 Oct; 35(10):651-2. PubMed ID: 19793949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Schrödinger's fetus examined. Blackshaw BP Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Jun; 23(2):321-323. PubMed ID: 31834552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Future-like-ours as a metaphysical reductio ad absurdum argument of personal identity. Chaffer TJ Bioethics; 2023 May; 37(4):367-373. PubMed ID: 36773306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "future like ours" argument and human embryonic stem cell research. Kuflik A J Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 34(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 18511611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Derivative deprivation and the wrong of abortion. Stratton-Lake P Bioethics; 2021 Mar; 35(3):277-283. PubMed ID: 33368424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The future-like-ours argument, personal identity, and the twinning dilemma. Brill HS Soc Theory Pract; 2003 Jul; 29(3):419-30. PubMed ID: 14696604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Two puzzles for Marquis's conservative view on abortion. Card RF Bioethics; 2006 Sep; 20(5):264-77. PubMed ID: 17100010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marquis: a defense of abortion? Gelfand SD Bioethics; 2001 Apr; 15(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 11697378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and the Epicurean challenge. Ekendahl K J Med Ethics; 2020 Apr; 46(4):273-274. PubMed ID: 31630130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]