163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3048105)
1. Sensitivity and specificity of endocervical curettage and the endocervical brush for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
Andersen W; Frierson H; Barber S; Tabbarah S; Taylor P; Underwood P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 3048105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outpatient evaluation of patients with atypical Papanicolaou smears: contribution of endocervical curettage.
Shingleton HM; Gore H; Austin JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep; 126(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 961737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy.
el-Dabh A; Rogers RE; Davis TE; Sutton GP
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2748050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The pre- and postoperative value of endocervical curettage in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer.
Fine BA; Feinstein GI; Sabella V
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 9784317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endometrial and endocervical curettage findings at the time of cervical conization.
Presley JJ; Hernandez E; Mudafort E; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1987 Feb; 32(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 3560085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of positive endocervical curettage in predicting endocervical canal involvement in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Husseinzadeh N; Carter V; Wesseler T
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Dec; 35(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 2599472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette.
Boardman LA; Meinz H; Steinhoff MM; Heber WW; Blume J
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 12636943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of endocervical curettage in the management of the patient with abnormal cervical cytologic findings.
Grainger DA; Roberts DK; Wells MM; Horbelt DV
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 156(3):625-8. PubMed ID: 3826211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endocervical curettage in the evaluation of cervical disease in patients with adequate colposcopy.
Soisson AP; Molina CY; Benson WL
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 3336531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cytobrush and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of dysplasia and malignancy of the uterine cervix.
Mogensen ST; Bak M; Dueholm M; Frost L; Knoblauch NO; Praest J; Svanholm H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1997 Jan; 76(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 9033248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing the sensitivity of endocervical curettings by performing ThinPrep® Pap on transport container fluid: is diagnostic material going down the drain?
Lastra RR; Meykler SE; Baloch ZW; Barroeta JE
Cytopathology; 2015 Dec; 26(6):368-72. PubMed ID: 25123326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
Partoll LM; Javaheri G
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The contribution of endocervical smears to cervical cancer detection.
Shingleton HM; Gore H; Austin JM; Littleton HJ; Straugin JM
Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 1096515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the Cytobrush as an aid in the evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou test.
Gosewehr JA; Julian TM; O'Connell BJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):440-3. PubMed ID: 1876381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing visual inspection with acetic acid plus random cervical biopsy plus endocervical curettage to colposcopic directed biopsy plus endocervical curettage in detecting cervical lesions in low-resource settings.
Puntachai P; Darojn D; Chumworathayi B; Chaousriku W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2665-8. PubMed ID: 22320971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphometric analysis of dysplasia in cervical cone biopsy specimens in cases with false-negative cytology.
Hartman B; Kaplan B; Boone D
Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Dec; 68(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 3785796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
