These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3048126)

  • 21. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wicklund v. Salvagni.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1996 Aug; 93():567-72. PubMed ID: 11648425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG; Dobson TA
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Causeway Medical Suite v. Ieyoub.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Louisiana
    Fed Suppl; 1995 Oct; 905():360-7. PubMed ID: 11648627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Thornburgh.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 656():879-90. PubMed ID: 11648557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reproductive health care and minors' rights.
    Paul EW; Klassel D
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 12339889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abortion: a new round.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
    Jackson CP
    Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Crying stones": a comparison of abortion in Japan and the United States.
    Wardle LD
    N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 1993; 14(2-3):183-259. PubMed ID: 11659814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Glick v. McKay.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nevada
    Fed Suppl; 1985 Jul; 616():322-8. PubMed ID: 11648357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mandatory parental consent to abortion. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association.
    JAMA; 1993 Jan; 269(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 8416412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Irish abortion: seeking refuge in a jurisprudence of doubt and delegation.
    Fox M; Murphy T
    J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):454-66. PubMed ID: 11656231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Attorney General.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Mar; 677():101-14. PubMed ID: 12041240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mandatory parental involvement in minors' abortions: effects of the laws in Minnesota, Missouri, and Indiana.
    Ellertson C
    Am J Public Health; 1997 Aug; 87(8):1367-74. PubMed ID: 9279279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hodgson v. Minnesota.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2926-72. PubMed ID: 12041294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.