These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30482410)

  • 1. Inter- and intraobserver reliability and critical analysis of the FFP classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries.
    Krappinger D; Kaser V; Kammerlander C; Neuerburg C; Merkel A; Lindtner RA
    Injury; 2019 Feb; 50(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 30482410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An alphanumeric classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries.
    Krappinger D; Kaser V; Merkel A; Neururer S; Lindtner RA
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2021 May; 141(5):861-869. PubMed ID: 32737571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The intra- and interobserver reliability of the Tile AO, the Young and Burgess, and FFP classifications in pelvic trauma.
    Berger-Groch J; Thiesen DM; Grossterlinden LG; Schaewel J; Fensky F; Hartel MJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 May; 139(5):645-650. PubMed ID: 30715568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities and critical analysis of the osteoporotic fracture classification of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures.
    Schönrogge M; Lahodski V; Otto R; Adolf D; Damm R; Sitte-Zöllner A; Piatek S
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35378632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reliability of the FFP classification in pelvic fractures].
    Walz M; Burger C; Kabir K; Welle K; Liener U; Goost H
    Unfallchirurg; 2021 Jul; 124(7):574-582. PubMed ID: 33656564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective study.
    Ansorge A; de Foy M; Poncet A; Gamulin A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 107(6):102999. PubMed ID: 34216840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis Classification: A Multicenter Assessment of the Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliabilities and Percentage of Agreement.
    Pieroh P; Höch A; Hohmann T; Gras F; Märdian S; Pflug A; Wittenberg S; Ihle C; Blankenburg N; Dallacker-Losensky K; Schröder T; Herath SC; Wagner D; Palm HG; Josten C; Stuby FM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Jun; 101(11):987-994. PubMed ID: 31169575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk factors for pelvic insufficiency fractures and outcome after conservative therapy.
    Maier GS; Kolbow K; Lazovic D; Horas K; Roth KE; Seeger JB; Maus U
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2016; 67():80-5. PubMed ID: 27448040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of three radiological classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Sayed-Noor AS; Agren PH; Wretenberg P
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Sep; 32(9):861-6. PubMed ID: 22097161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interobserver reliability of the young-burgess and tile classification systems for fractures of the pelvic ring.
    Koo H; Leveridge M; Thompson C; Zdero R; Bhandari M; Kreder HJ; Stephen D; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 18594301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of pelvic tilt on sacral insufficiency fracture occurrence: Insights into the prevalence of high pelvic tilt among patients affected.
    Jäckle K; Meier MP; Klockner F; Roch PJ; Hawellek T; Weiser L; Lehmann W
    Injury; 2024 Jun; 55(6):111520. PubMed ID: 38594084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification of pelvic fractures: analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability using the Young-Burgess and Tile classification systems.
    Furey AJ; O'Toole RV; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Copeland CE; Turen C
    Orthopedics; 2009 Jun; 32(6):401. PubMed ID: 19634829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fragility fractures of the pelvis: should they be fixed?
    Rommens PM; Dietz SO; Ossendorf C; Pairon P; Wagner D; Hofmann A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2015; 82(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 26317181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mobility and mortality of 340 patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis.
    Yoshida M; Tajima K; Saito Y; Sato K; Uenishi N; Iwata M
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2021 Feb; 47(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 32860102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraobserver Reliability and Interobserver Agreement in Radiographic Classification of Heterotopic Ossification.
    Vasileiadis GI; Itoigawa Y; Amanatullah DF; Pulido-Sierra L; Crenshaw JR; Huyber C; Taunton MJ; Kaufman KR
    Orthopedics; 2017 Jan; 40(1):e54-e58. PubMed ID: 27684082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and Agreement of Different Spine Fracture Classification Systems: An Independent Intraobserver and Interobserver Study.
    Pishnamaz M; Balosu S; Curfs I; Uhing D; Laubach M; Herren C; Weber C; Hildebrand F; Willems P; Kobbe P
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 115():e695-e702. PubMed ID: 29709750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The imaging and classification of severe pelvic ring fractures: Experiences from two level 1 trauma centres.
    Gabbe BJ; Esser M; Bucknill A; Russ MK; Hofstee DJ; Cameron PA; Handley C; de Steiger RN
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1396-401. PubMed ID: 24078539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.