BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30483177)

  • 21. Sowing the seeds of stereotypes: Spontaneous inferences about groups.
    Hamilton DL; Chen JM; Ko DM; Winczewski L; Banerji I; Thurston JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Oct; 109(4):569-88. PubMed ID: 26414841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Affect Misattribution in the Interpretation of Ambiguous Stimuli in Terms of Warmth vs. Competence: Behavioral Phenomenon and Its Neural Correlates.
    Imbir KK; Duda-Goławska J; Jurkiewicz G; Pastwa M; Sobieszek A; Wielgopolan A; Żygierewicz J
    Brain Sci; 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36009156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differentiating the effects of anger and sadness: A perspective of spontaneous trait inference.
    Shi W; Yang F; Xia J; Wang M
    Int J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 54(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 29658116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Affective judgement about information relating to competence and warmth: an embodied perspective.
    Freddi S; Tessier M; Lacrampe R; Dru V
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2014 Jun; 53(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 23577960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How Warmth Appeal Affects Persuasion: The Moderating Role of Brand Concepts.
    Jin F; Zhang J; Wu B; Zhu X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():831373. PubMed ID: 35432143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Judgments of warmth and competence in a computerized paradigm: Little evidence of proposed impression formation asymmetries.
    Jørgensen Ø; Bäckström M; Björklund F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175210. PubMed ID: 28388687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: does content matter?
    Tausch N; Kenworthy JB; Hewstone M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(3):542-56. PubMed ID: 17352608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can valence and origin of emotional words influence the assessments of ambiguous stimuli in terms of warmth or competence?
    Imbir KK; Pastwa M
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10488. PubMed ID: 33569246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Judging Political Hearts and Minds: How Political Dynamics Drive Social Judgments.
    Cornwell JF; Bajger AT; Higgins ET
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26068717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Valence and Origin of Emotional Words Influence on Subsequent Perception of Ambiguous Stimuli in Terms of Competence Versus Warmth.
    Imbir KK
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1549-1571. PubMed ID: 28639175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference are both unaffected by prior evaluations of informants.
    Zengel B; Ambler JK; McCarthy RJ; Skowronski JJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(3):382-387. PubMed ID: 27220061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. EEG components of spontaneous trait inferences.
    Van Duynslaeger M; Sterken C; Van Overwalle F; Verstraeten E
    Soc Neurosci; 2008; 3(2):164-77. PubMed ID: 18633857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-Accuracy on the Internet: Initial Tests of Underlying Dimensions, Contributing Factors, and Biases.
    Tsankova E; Tair E
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():837931. PubMed ID: 35310286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spontaneous trait inference and construal level theory: Psychological distance increases nonconscious trait thinking.
    Rim S; Uleman JS; Trope Y
    J Exp Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 45(5):1088-1097. PubMed ID: 21822331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spontaneous state inferences.
    Kruse F; Degner J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Oct; 121(4):774-791. PubMed ID: 34516181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. More Power, More Warmth: The Enhancing Effect of Power on the Perceived Warmth About High-Power Individuals Under Chinese Culture.
    Li M; Yang F; Han Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():874861. PubMed ID: 35719551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences.
    Todorov A; Uleman JS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Oct; 87(4):482-93. PubMed ID: 15491273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spontaneous and intentional trait inferences recruit a common mentalizing network to a different degree: spontaneous inferences activate only its core areas.
    Ma N; Vandekerckhove M; Van Overwalle F; Seurinck R; Fias W
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(2):123-38. PubMed ID: 20661837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. You are fair, but I expect you to also behave unfairly: Positive asymmetry in trait-behavior relations for moderate morality information.
    Rusconi P; Sacchi S; Capellini R; Brambilla M; Cherubini P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180686. PubMed ID: 28700702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrophysiological time course and brain areas of spontaneous and intentional trait inferences.
    Van Duynslaeger M; Van Overwalle F; Verstraeten E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 2(3):174-88. PubMed ID: 18985139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.