290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30484184)
1. Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions.
Akbulut A; Kılınç DD
Oral Radiol; 2019 Jan; 35(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 30484184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Arieta-Miranda JM; Silva-Valencia M; Flores-Mir C; Paredes-Sampen NA; Arriola-Guillen LE
Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():36. PubMed ID: 24325842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.
Rodrigues AF; Fraga MR; Vitral RW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 19651349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluations of the morphology and position of condyle and fossa of adolescent temporomandibular joint with Class Ⅱsubdivision malocclusions].
Ding YF; Song LJ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2020 Dec; 29(6):656-660. PubMed ID: 33778837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of skeletal structure of temporomandibular joint through cone-beam CT between Angle ClassⅠ, Ⅱ
Song JY; Qian LW; Cheng MJ; Qian YF
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Aprial; 28(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 31384898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in permanent dentition according to Angle's classification.
Song J; Cheng M; Qian Y; Chu F
Oral Radiol; 2020 Jul; 36(3):261-266. PubMed ID: 31385140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].
Zhou J; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 33550344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive positional and morphological assessments of the temporomandibular joint in adolescents with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a retrospective CBCT study.
Chen Y; Li L; Li Y; Luo N; Dai H; Zhou J
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):78. PubMed ID: 36750919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved Visualization and Assessment of Condylar Position in the Glenoid Fossa for Different Occlusions: A CBCT Study.
Kaur A; Natt AS; Mehra SK; Maheshwari K; Singh G; Kaur A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 27659088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional positional assessment of glenoid fossae and mandibular condyles in patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion.
de Mattos JM; Palomo JM; de Oliveira Ruellas AC; Cheib PL; Eliliwi M; Souki BQ
Angle Orthod; 2017 Nov; 87(6):847-854. PubMed ID: 28862492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint position and morphology in female patients with skeletal class II malocclusion.
Lin M; Xu Y; Wu H; Zhang H; Wang S; Qi K
J Int Med Res; 2020 Feb; 48(2):300060519892388. PubMed ID: 31878826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Anatomy of temporomandibular joint and condyle position in Uygur adult patients evaluated with cone-beam CT].
Wang JR; Pan X; Mi CB
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Aug; 25(4):461-464. PubMed ID: 27858071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2D-3D comparison of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class II versus Class I adults: A retrospective study.
García-Díaz R; Arriola-Guillén LE; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Agudelo-Botero AM; Fiori-Chincaro GA
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):784-793. PubMed ID: 32513609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative condyle positioning by sonographic monitoring in orthognathic surgery verified by MRI.
Bethge LS; Ballon A; Mack M; Landes C
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 25457463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Three-dimensional morphological features of temporomandibular joint in skeletal malocclusion Class III patients with different vertical skeletal facial types].
Chen J; Duan Y; Tu J; Yuan Y; Lei Y
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Jun; 43(6):625-630. PubMed ID: 30110004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in malocclusion subjects: condylar morphology and position.
Merigue LF; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L; Almeida MR
Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 26981751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of sagittal temporomandibular condyle position in adolescent Angle Class II division 1 patients by cone-beam CT].
Fang HJ; Tao L
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Dec; 23(6):740-3. PubMed ID: 25636294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of segmental Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the condyle position in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
He W; Xie XY; Wang X; Wang XX; Fu KY; Li ZL
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Oct; 47(5):829-33. PubMed ID: 26474625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class I malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.
Rodrigues AF; Fraga MR; Vitral RW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 19651348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prevalence of TMJ osteoarthritis in asymptomatic patients with dentofacial deformities: a cone-beam CT study.
Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Neimane L; Ragovska I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 41(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 22464854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
