88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30484479)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health.
Entringer AP; Pinto M; Gomes MASM
Rev Saude Publica; 2018 Nov; 52():91. PubMed ID: 30484479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of spontaneous vaginal delivery and elective cesarean for normal risk pregnant women in the Brazilian Unified National Health System].
Entringer AP; Pinto M; Dias MAB; Gomes MASM
Cad Saude Publica; 2018 May; 34(5):e00022517. PubMed ID: 29768579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Costs analysis of hospital care for vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section for usual risk pregnant women in the Brazilian Unified National Health System.
Entringer AP; Pinto MFT; Gomes MASM
Cien Saude Colet; 2019 Apr; 24(4):1527-1536. PubMed ID: 31066854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.
Nakamura-Pereira M; do Carmo Leal M; Esteves-Pereira AP; Domingues RM; Torres JA; Dias MA; Moreira ME
Reprod Health; 2016 Oct; 13(Suppl 3):128. PubMed ID: 27766941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fear of childbirth and risk of cesarean delivery: a cohort study in six European countries.
Ryding EL; Lukasse M; Parys AS; Wangel AM; Karro H; Kristjansdottir H; Schroll AM; Schei B;
Birth; 2015 Mar; 42(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 25676793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
Christensen LF; Overgaard C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between prenatal and parturition in the supplementary health network and elective cesarean section.
Ferrari AP; Carvalhaes MA; Parada CM
Rev Bras Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 19(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 27167650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indications for Emergency Intervention, Mode of Delivery, and the Childbirth Experience.
Handelzalts JE; Waldman Peyser A; Krissi H; Levy S; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169132. PubMed ID: 28046019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Getting the first birth right: A retrospective study of outcomes for low-risk primiparous women receiving standard care versus midwifery model of care in the same tertiary hospital.
Wong N; Browne J; Ferguson S; Taylor J; Davis D
Women Birth; 2015 Dec; 28(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 26190817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Elective cesarean delivery to prevent perinatal transmission of hepatitis C virus: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Plunkett BA; Grobman WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):998-1003. PubMed ID: 15467579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cost effectiveness analysis of midwife psycho-education for fearful pregnant women - a health system perspective for the antenatal period.
Toohill J; Callander E; Gamble J; Creedy DK; Fenwick J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):217. PubMed ID: 28693447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia--a decision analysis.
Culligan PJ; Myers JA; Goldberg RP; Blackwell L; Gohmann SF; Abell TD
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2005; 16(1):19-28; discussion 28. PubMed ID: 15647962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Budgetary impact of spontaneous vaginal delivery and elective cesarean section without clinical indication in BrazilImpacto presupuestario del parto vaginal espontáneo y de la cesárea electiva sin indicación clínica en Brasil].
Entringer AP; Gomes MASM; da Costa ACC; Pinto M
Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2018; 42():e116. PubMed ID: 31093144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cluster-randomized trial to reduce caesarean delivery rates in Quebec: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Johri M; Ng ESW; Bermudez-Tamayo C; Hoch JS; Ducruet T; Chaillet N
BMC Med; 2017 May; 15(1):96. PubMed ID: 28528578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of cesarean section in a private health service in Brazil: indications and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates.
Almeida MA; Araujo Júnior E; Camano L; Peixoto AB; Martins WP; Mattar R
Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 29510632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of perinatal outcomes among different typesof deliveries in term pregnancies in a reference maternity of Southeast Brazil.
Leite AC; Araujo Júnior E; Helfer TM; Marcolino LA; Vasques FA; Sá RA
Ceska Gynekol; 2016 Jan; 81(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 26982066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
