119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30485229)
21. Evaluation of implant properties, safety profile and clinical efficacy of patient-specific acrylic prosthesis in cranioplasty using 3D binderjet printed cranium model: A pilot study.
Basu B; Bhaskar N; Barui S; Sharma V; Das S; Govindarajan N; Hegde P; Perikal PJ; Antharasanahalli Shivakumar M; Khanapure K; Tekkatte Jagannatha A
J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 85():132-142. PubMed ID: 33581784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patient specific Polymethyl methacrylate customised cranioplasty using 3D printed silicone moulds: Technical note.
Scerrati A; Travaglini F; Gelmi CAE; Lombardo A; De Bonis P; Cavallo MA; Zamboni P
Int J Med Robot; 2022 Apr; 18(2):e2353. PubMed ID: 34786816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Letter to editor: Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.
Zaidi SMF; Rehman FU; Rangwala BS
Neurosurg Rev; 2024 Mar; 47(1):112. PubMed ID: 38467929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of Three-dimensional Printing in Neurosurgery: An Institutional Experience.
Chaudhary A; Chopra S; Sinha VD
Asian J Neurosurg; 2021; 16(3):531-538. PubMed ID: 34660365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Customized anterior temporal augmentation for treating anterior temporal hollowing (ATH) by 3D-printed cranioplasty.
Wongsirisuwan M
Neurochirurgie; 2024 Jan; 70(1):101528. PubMed ID: 38142616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Three-Dimensional Printed Polymethylmethacrylate Casting Molds for Posterior Fossa Reconstruction in the Surgical Treatment of Chiari I Malformation: Technical Note and Illustrative Cases.
Pijpker PAJ; Wagemakers M; Kraeima J; Vergeer RA; Kuijlen JMA; Groen RJM
World Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 129():148-156. PubMed ID: 31150856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Efficacy of 3D-Printed Titanium Mesh-Type Patient-Specific Implant for Cranioplasty.
Yoon HG; Ko Y; Kim YS; Bak KH; Chun HJ; Na MK; Yang S; Yi HJ; Choi KS
Korean J Neurotrauma; 2021 Oct; 17(2):91-99. PubMed ID: 34760819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical Evaluation of Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Cranial Implants for Virtual Surgical Planning: An In-Vitro Study.
Msallem B; Maintz M; Halbeisen FS; Meyer S; Sigron GR; Sharma N; Cao S; Thieringer FM
Materials (Basel); 2022 Mar; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 35269201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Translucent Customized Cranial Implants Made of Clear Polymethylmethacrylate: An Early Outcome Analysis of 55 Consecutive Cranioplasty Cases.
Shay T; Mitchell KA; Belzberg M; Zelko I; Mahapatra S; Qian J; Mendoza L; Huang J; Brem H; Gordon C
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Dec; 85(6):e27-e36. PubMed ID: 33170582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Outcomes of Cranioplasty with Preformed Titanium versus Freehand Molded Polymethylmethacrylate Implants.
Höhne J; Werzmirzowsky K; Ott C; Hohenberger C; Hassanin BG; Brawanski A; Schebesch KM
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 May; 79(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 28800664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cranioplasty Using Customized 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants: An International Collaboration Effort to Improve Neurosurgical Care.
Nguyen B; Ashraf O; Richards R; Tra H; Huynh T
World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():174-180. PubMed ID: 33647494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cranioplasty: Review of Materials.
Zanotti B; Zingaretti N; Verlicchi A; Robiony M; Alfieri A; Parodi PC
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 27(8):2061-2072. PubMed ID: 28005754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty.
Ebel F; Schön S; Sharma N; Guzman R; Mariani L; Thieringer FM; Soleman J
Neurosurg Rev; 2023 Apr; 46(1):93. PubMed ID: 37074490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty using low-cost customised 3D printed moulds for cranial defects - a single Centre experience: technical note.
Đurić KS; Barić H; Domazet I; Barl P; Njirić N; Mrak G
Br J Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 33(4):376-378. PubMed ID: 30732480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Customized and Cost-Effective 3D Printed Mold for Cranioplasty: India's First Single Center Experience.
Gopal S; Rudrappa S; Sekar A; Preethish-Kumar V; Masapu D
Neurol India; 2021; 69(3):611-617. PubMed ID: 34169853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A fully ingrowing implant for cranial reconstruction: Results in critical size defects in sheep using 3D-printed titanium scaffold.
Hubbe U; Beiser S; Kuhn S; Stark T; Hoess A; Cristina-Schmitz H; Vasilikos I; Metzger MC; Rothweiler R
Biomater Adv; 2022 May; 136():212754. PubMed ID: 35929289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using rapid prototyping molds to create patient specific polymethylmethacrylate implants in cranioplasty.
Gerber N; Stieglitz L; Peterhans M; Nolte LP; Raabe A; Weber S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3357-60. PubMed ID: 21097234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Customised Cranioplasty Implant for Decompressive Craniectomy Patients ? A Technical Note.
Mohammad K
Turk Neurosurg; 2019; 29(1):148-150. PubMed ID: 28481392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty.
Zhang J; Su Y; Rao X; Pang H; Zhu H; Liu L; Chen L; Li D; He J; Peng J; Jiang Y
Int J Bioprint; 2023; 9(1):634. PubMed ID: 36844244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
