132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30485303)
1. Relative robustness of NOEC and ECx against large uncertainties in data.
Tanaka Y; Nakamura K; Yokomizo H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206901. PubMed ID: 30485303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the Choice of NOEC or EC10 Affect the Hazardous Concentration for 5% of the Species?
Iwasaki Y; Kotani K; Kashiwada S; Masunaga S
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(15):9326-30. PubMed ID: 26167813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation and comparison of the relationship between NOEC and EC10 or EC20 values in chronic Daphnia toxicity testing.
Beasley A; Belanger SE; Brill JL; Otter RR
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2378-84. PubMed ID: 26033640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New technique for estimating thresholds of toxicity in ecological risk assessment.
Hanson ML; Solomon KR
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Aug; 36(15):3257-64. PubMed ID: 12188350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new perspective on the Dunnett procedure: filling the gap between NOEC/LOEC and ECx concepts.
Delignette-Muller ML; Forfait C; Billoir E; Charles S
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2888-91. PubMed ID: 21932292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The drive to ban the NOEC/LOEC in favor of ECx is misguided and misinformed.
Green JW; Springer TA; Staveley JP
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 22991182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems.
De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 18774172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical analysis of regulatory ecotoxicity tests.
Isnard P; Flammarion P; Roman G; Babut M; Bastien P; Bintein S; Esserméant L; Férard JF; Gallotti-Schmitt S; Saouter E; Saroli M; Thiébaud H; Tomassone R; Vindimian E
Chemosphere; 2001 Nov; 45(4-5):659-69. PubMed ID: 11680762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
Fox DR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical results and implications of the enchytraeid reproduction ringtest.
Weyers A; Römbke J; Moser T; Ratte HT
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 May; 36(10):2116-21. PubMed ID: 12038819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical comparisons of the no-observed-effect concentration and the effective concentration at 10% inhibition (EC10) in algal toxicity tests.
Shieh JN; Chao MR; Chen CY
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 11380172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time to get off the fence: the need for definitive international guidance on statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data.
van Dam RA; Harford AJ; Warne MS
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 22308052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Conventional assessment factor method vs. species sensitivity distribution method.
Sorgog K; Kamo M
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Nov; 183():109494. PubMed ID: 31376805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the ECx a legitimate surrogate for a NOEC?
Fox DR
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):351-3. PubMed ID: 19645096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration of probabilistic exposure assessment and probabilistic hazard characterization.
van der Voet H; Slob W
Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):351-71. PubMed ID: 17511703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical uncertainty in hazardous terrestrial concentrations estimated with aquatic ecotoxicity data.
Golsteijn L; van Zelm R; Hendriks AJ; Huijbregts MA
Chemosphere; 2013 Sep; 93(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 23735489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physiological modes of action across species and toxicants: the key to predictive ecotoxicology.
Ashauer R; Jager T
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29090718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 15th International Symposium on Toxicity Assessment : new directions in ecotoxicology and meeting the challenges ahead.
Au DW
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Aug; 19(7):2463-4. PubMed ID: 22678546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
