These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30485350)

  • 1. Performance metrics for an application-driven selection and optimization of psychophysical sampling procedures.
    Rinderknecht MD; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207217. PubMed ID: 30485350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancing simulations with intra-subject variability for improved psychophysical assessments.
    Rinderknecht MD; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209839. PubMed ID: 30596761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Algorithm for improving psychophysical threshold estimates by detecting sustained inattention in experiments using PEST.
    Rinderknecht MD; Ranzani R; Popp WL; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1629-1645. PubMed ID: 29748784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.
    Wichmann FA; Hill NJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1293-313. PubMed ID: 11800458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments.
    Karmali F; Chaudhuri SE; Yi Y; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 26645306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying steep psychometric function slope quickly in clinical applications.
    Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick A
    Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2476-85. PubMed ID: 20801144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: a computer simulation.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1969-76. PubMed ID: 10530021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive psychophysical procedures, loss functions, and entropy.
    Kelareva E; Mewing J; Turpin A; Wirth A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):2003-12. PubMed ID: 20952796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11800464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling plans for fitting the psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 8(2):256-89. PubMed ID: 16255393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
    Kontsevich LL; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2729-37. PubMed ID: 10492833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15190695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures motivated by the theory of optimal experiments: simulated and experimental results.
    Remus JJ; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):315-26. PubMed ID: 18177161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the analysis of psychometric functions: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1399-420. PubMed ID: 11800465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Do's and Don'ts of Psychophysical Methods for Interpretability of Psychometric Functions and Their Descriptors.
    García-Pérez MÁ; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E56. PubMed ID: 31868158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model Based or Model Free? Comparing Adaptive Methods for Estimating Thresholds in Neuroscience.
    Audiffren J; Bresciani JP
    Neural Comput; 2022 Jan; 34(2):338-359. PubMed ID: 34915578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions.
    Chaudhuri SE; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 23250442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function.
    Strasburger H
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1348-55. PubMed ID: 11800461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures based on the theory of optimal experiments and bayesian techniques: implications for cochlear implant testing.
    Remus JJ; Collins LM
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Apr; 69(3):311-23. PubMed ID: 17672419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research.
    Leek MR
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1279-92. PubMed ID: 11800457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.