141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30485717)
1. Mechanistic modeling based process analytical technology implementation for pooling in hydrophobic interaction chromatography.
Shekhawat LK; Rathore AS
Biotechnol Prog; 2019 Mar; 35(2):e2758. PubMed ID: 30485717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanistic Modeling Based PAT Implementation for Ion-Exchange Process Chromatography of Charge Variants of Monoclonal Antibody Products.
Kumar V; Rathore AS
Biotechnol J; 2017 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 28731622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Large scale demonstration of a process analytical technology application in bioprocessing: use of on-line high performance liquid chromatography for making real time pooling decisions for process chromatography.
Rathore AS; Parr L; Dermawan S; Lawson K; Lu Y
Biotechnol Prog; 2010; 26(2):448-57. PubMed ID: 19927320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Case study and application of process analytical technology (PAT) towards bioprocessing: use of on-line high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for making real-time pooling decisions for process chromatography.
Rathore AS; Yu M; Yeboah S; Sharma A
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Jun; 100(2):306-16. PubMed ID: 18078292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Case study and application of process analytical technology (PAT) towards bioprocessing: Use of tryptophan fluorescence as at-line tool for making pooling decisions for process chromatography.
Rathore AS; Li X; Bartkowski W; Sharma A; Lu Y
Biotechnol Prog; 2009; 25(5):1433-9. PubMed ID: 19725111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of HPLC as an Enabler of Process Analytical Technology in Process Chromatography.
Tiwari A; Kateja N; Chanana S; Rathore AS
Anal Chem; 2018 Jul; 90(13):7824-7829. PubMed ID: 29847937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital twin of a continuous chromatography process for mAb purification: Design and model-based control.
Tiwari A; Masampally VS; Agarwal A; Rathore AS
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2023 Mar; 120(3):748-766. PubMed ID: 36517960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-stage chromatographic separation of aggregates for monoclonal antibody therapeutics.
Kumar V; Rathore AS
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Nov; 1368():155-62. PubMed ID: 25441350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling of hydrophobic interaction chromatography for the separation of antibody-drug conjugates and its application towards quality by design.
Andris S; Hubbuch J
J Biotechnol; 2020 Jun; 317():48-58. PubMed ID: 32361022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography for the characterization of monoclonal antibodies and related products.
Fekete S; Veuthey JL; Beck A; Guillarme D
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2016 Oct; 130():3-18. PubMed ID: 27084526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Case study and application of process analytical technology (PAT) towards bioprocessing: II. Use of ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) for making real-time pooling decisions for process chromatography.
Rathore AS; Wood R; Sharma A; Dermawan S
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Dec; 101(6):1366-74. PubMed ID: 18814284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Water on hydrophobic surfaces: Mechanistic modeling of hydrophobic interaction chromatography.
Wang G; Hahn T; Hubbuch J
J Chromatogr A; 2016 Sep; 1465():71-8. PubMed ID: 27575919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defining process design space for a hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) purification step: application of quality by design (QbD) principles.
Jiang C; Flansburg L; Ghose S; Jorjorian P; Shukla AA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Dec; 107(6):985-97. PubMed ID: 20683852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real-time monitoring and control of the load phase of a protein A capture step.
Rüdt M; Brestrich N; Rolinger L; Hubbuch J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2017 Feb; 114(2):368-373. PubMed ID: 27543789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design of experiments applications in bioprocessing: Chromatography process development using split design of experiments.
Shekhawat LK; Godara A; Kumar V; Rathore AS
Biotechnol Prog; 2019 Jan; 35(1):e2730. PubMed ID: 30315679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of ion exchange sigmoidal gradients using hybrid models: Implementation of quality by design in analytical method development.
Joshi VS; Kumar V; Rathore AS
J Chromatogr A; 2017 Mar; 1491():145-152. PubMed ID: 28259457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring mAb cultivations with in-situ raman spectroscopy: The influence of spectral selectivity on calibration models and industrial use as reliable PAT tool.
Santos RM; Kessler JM; Salou P; Menezes JC; Peinado A
Biotechnol Prog; 2018 May; 34(3):659-670. PubMed ID: 29603907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Water on hydrophobic surfaces: mechanistic modeling of polyethylene glycol-induced protein precipitation.
Großhans S; Wang G; Hubbuch J
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2019 Apr; 42(4):513-520. PubMed ID: 30535587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Isolation of monoclonal antibody from a Chinese hamster ovary supernatant. II: dynamics of the integrated separation on ion exchange and hydrophobic interaction chromatography media.
Marek W; Muca R; Woś S; Piątkowski W; Antos D
J Chromatogr A; 2013 Aug; 1305():64-75. PubMed ID: 23890554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Integrated Approach to Aggregate Control for Therapeutic Bispecific Antibodies Using an Improved Three Column Mab Platform-Like Purification Process.
Andrade C; Arnold L; Motabar D; Aspelund M; Tang A; Hunter A; Chung WK
Biotechnol Prog; 2019 Jan; 35(1):e2720. PubMed ID: 30298991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
