These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30487096)

  • 1. Are psychophysically chosen lifting loads based on joint kinetics?
    Banks JJ; Caldwell GE
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():17-23. PubMed ID: 30487096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A field evaluation method for assessing whole body biomechanical joint stress in manual lifting tasks.
    Lin CJ; Wang SJ; Chen HJ
    Ind Health; 2006 Oct; 44(4):604-12. PubMed ID: 17085922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using a marker-less method for estimating L5/S1 moments during symmetrical lifting.
    Mehrizi R; Xu X; Zhang S; Pavlovic V; Metaxas D; Li K
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():541-550. PubMed ID: 28110917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysically determining the maximum acceptable weight of lift for polypropylene laminated bags.
    Chen YL; Ho TK
    Ind Health; 2016 Dec; 54(6):550-553. PubMed ID: 27181917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and containers.
    Lee TH
    Ind Health; 2005 Apr; 43(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 15895850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex-based differences in lifting technique under increasing load conditions: A principal component analysis.
    Sheppard PS; Stevenson JM; Graham RB
    Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():186-95. PubMed ID: 26851478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of 3-D peak L5/S1 joint moment during asymmetric lifting tasks with cubic spline interpolation of segment Euler angles.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21529774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature extraction and quantification of the variability of dynamic performance profiles due to the different sagittal lift characteristics.
    Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Sparto PJ; Barin K
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1999 Sep; 7(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 10498374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two linear regression models predicting cumulative dynamic L5/S1 joint moment during a range of lifting tasks based on static postures.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Lu ML
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1093-103. PubMed ID: 22803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Workers' biomechanical loads and kinematics during multiple-task manual material handling.
    Harari Y; Bechar A; Riemer R
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Feb; 83():102985. PubMed ID: 31698226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lift performance and lumbar loading in standing and seated lifts.
    Middleton KJ; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ
    Ergonomics; 2016 Sep; 59(9):1242-50. PubMed ID: 26772388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related differences do affect postural kinematics and joint kinetics during repetitive lifting.
    Boocock MG; Mawston GA; Taylor S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 25576019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal lifting techniques adopted by Chinese men when determining their maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Chen YL
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 11071415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
    Behjati M; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.