These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30488191)

  • 21. Orienting of attention and eye movements.
    Sheliga BM; Riggio L; Rizzolatti G
    Exp Brain Res; 1994; 98(3):507-22. PubMed ID: 8056071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
    Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exogenous and endogenous shifts of attention in perihand space.
    Le Bigot N; Grosjean M
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):677-84. PubMed ID: 26134543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The importance of context information for the spatial specificity of gaze cueing.
    Wiese E; Zwickel J; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):967-82. PubMed ID: 23504713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Temporal and spatial characteristics of attention to facilitate manual and eye-movement responses.
    Tanaka Y; Shimojo S
    Perception; 2001; 30(3):283-302. PubMed ID: 11374201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Object-based control of attention is sensitive to recent experience.
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Kramer AF; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 21967274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When is object-based attention not based on objects?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1062-1082. PubMed ID: 31021155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention.
    Law MB; Abrams RA
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Oct; 64(7):1017-27. PubMed ID: 12489658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hemispatial asymmetries in judgment of stimulus size.
    Charles J; Sahraie A; McGeorge P
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jul; 69(5):687-98. PubMed ID: 17929692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Cortex; 2005 Aug; 41(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 16042026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The size of attentional focus modulates the perception of object location.
    Kirsch W; Kunde W
    Vision Res; 2021 Feb; 179():1-8. PubMed ID: 33264688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The disengage deficit in hemispatial neglect is restricted to between-object shifts and is abolished by prism adaptation.
    Schindler I; McIntosh RD; Cassidy TP; Birchall D; Benson V; Ietswaart M; Milner AD
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 18854994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rapid changes in visual-spatial attention distort object shape.
    Fortenbaugh FC; Prinzmetal W; Robertson LC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Apr; 18(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 21327371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.