These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30488191)
41. Determining priority between attentional and referential-coding sources of the Simon effect through optokinetic stimulation. Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Rubichi S; Doricchi F Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19961865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Motion and position shifts induced by the double-drift stimulus are unaffected by attentional load. Haladjian HH; Lisi M; Cavanagh P Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):884-893. PubMed ID: 29476332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue. Yeshurun Y; Carrasco M Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 18306965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Center of mass attracts attention. Zhou X; Chu H; Li X; Zhan Y Neuroreport; 2006 Jan; 17(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 16361956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue. Henderson JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 1826325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The coupling between spatial attention and other components of task-set: A task-switching investigation. Longman CS; Lavric A; Monsell S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2248-75. PubMed ID: 27033987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Peripheral cues and gaze direction jointly focus attention and inhibition of return. Hudson M; Skarratt PA Cogn Neurosci; 2016; 7(1-4):67-73. PubMed ID: 26257306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Neural mechanisms of spatial- and feature-based attention: a quantitative analysis. Stoppel CM; Boehler CN; Sabelhaus C; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM; Schoenfeld MA Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1181():51-60. PubMed ID: 17961522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Bullet trains and steam engines: exogenous attention zips but endogenous attention chugs along. Chakravarthi R; VanRullen R J Vis; 2011 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 21508269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Changes in visuospatial attention over the adult lifespan. Greenwood PM; Parasuraman R; Haxby JV Neuropsychologia; 1993 May; 31(5):471-85. PubMed ID: 8502379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Investigation of object-based attention in pigeons (Columba livia) and hill mynas (Gracula religiosa) using a spatial cueing task. Fujii K; Ushitani T J Comp Psychol; 2020 Feb; 134(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 31318224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention. Roberts KL; Humphreys GW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments. Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Perceived gaze direction in faces and spatial attention: a study in patients with parietal damage and unilateral neglect. Vuilleumier P Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(7):1013-26. PubMed ID: 11900753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Processing demand modulates the effects of spatial attention on the judged duration of a brief stimulus. Chen Z; O'Neill P Percept Psychophys; 2001 Oct; 63(7):1229-38. PubMed ID: 11766946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Misperceiving space following shifts of attention: determining the locus of the attentional repulsion effect. DiGiacomo A; Pratt J Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 64():35-41. PubMed ID: 22677882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention. Şentürk G; Greenberg AS; Liu T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1998-2013. PubMed ID: 27225468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Crossmodal coupling of oculomotor control and spatial attention in vision and audition. Rolfs M; Engbert R; Kliegl R Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):427-39. PubMed ID: 16032403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues. Botta F; Lupiáñez J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Target frequency modulates object-based attention. Nah JC; Shomstein S Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Oct; 27(5):981-989. PubMed ID: 32495212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]