98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30488484)
1. An empiric approach to identifying physician peer groups from claims data: An example from breast cancer care.
Herrin J; Soulos PR; Xu X; Gross CP; Pollack CE
Health Serv Res; 2019 Feb; 54(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30488484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician trajectories of abandoning long-course breast radiotherapy and their cost impact.
Xu X; Soulos PR; Herrin J; Wang SY; Pollack CE; Evans SB; Yu JB; Gross CP
Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 56(3):497-506. PubMed ID: 33070305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data.
Gold HT; Do HT
Health Serv Res; 2007 Oct; 42(5):2056-69. PubMed ID: 17850533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer.
Nattinger AB; Laud PW; Bajorunaite R; Sparapani RA; Freeman JL
Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1733-49. PubMed ID: 15533184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgeon peer network characteristics and adoption of new imaging techniques in breast cancer: A study of perioperative MRI.
Tannenbaum SS; Soulos PR; Herrin J; Pollack CE; Xu X; Christakis NA; Forman HP; Yu JB; Killelea BK; Wang SY; Gross CP
Cancer Med; 2018 Dec; 7(12):5901-5909. PubMed ID: 30444005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician peer group characteristics and timeliness of breast cancer surgery.
Bachand J; Soulos PR; Herrin J; Pollack CE; Xu X; Ma X; Gross CP
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Aug; 170(3):657-665. PubMed ID: 29693229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Shared Patient Networks Across Payers.
Trogdon JG; Weir WH; Shai S; Mucha PJ; Kuo TM; Meyer AM; Stitzenberg KB
J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2014-2020. PubMed ID: 30945065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Leveraging Linkage of Cohort Studies With Administrative Claims Data to Identify Individuals With Cancer.
Bronson MR; Kapadia NS; Austin AM; Wang Q; Feskanich D; Bynum JPW; Grodstein F; Tosteson ANA
Med Care; 2018 Dec; 56(12):e83-e89. PubMed ID: 29334524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data.
Klabunde CN; Potosky AL; Legler JM; Warren JL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Dec; 53(12):1258-67. PubMed ID: 11146273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing central cancer registry treatment data using physician medical claims: a Florida pilot project.
Hernandez MN; MacKinnon JA; Penberthy L; Bonner J; Huang YX
J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 25153009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining care provided for breast cancer based on medical record review or Medicare claims: information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Patterns of Care Study.
Fleming ST; Kimmick GG; Sabatino SA; Cress RD; Wu XC; Trentham-Dietz A; Huang B; Hwang W; Liff JM;
Ann Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 22(11):807-13. PubMed ID: 22948184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment.
Cooper GS; Yuan Z; Stange KC; Dennis LK; Amini SB; Rimm AA
Med Care; 2000 Apr; 38(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 10752973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Construct validity of medicare chemotherapy claims: the case of 5FU.
Lamont EB; Lauderdale DS; Schilsky RL; Christakis NA
Med Care; 2002 Mar; 40(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 11880793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ability of Medicare claims data to identify nursing home patients: a validation study.
Koroukian SM; Xu F; Murray P
Med Care; 2008 Nov; 46(11):1184-7. PubMed ID: 18953230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New approaches to measuring the comprehensiveness of primary care physicians.
O'Malley AS; Rich EC; Shang L; Rose T; Ghosh A; Poznyak D; Peikes D
Health Serv Res; 2019 Apr; 54(2):356-366. PubMed ID: 30613955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using physician claims to identify postoperative complications of carotid endarterectomy.
Mitchell JB; Ballard DJ; Whisnant JP; Ammering CJ; Matchar DB; Samsa GP
Health Serv Res; 1996 Jun; 31(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 8675436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients.
Klabunde CN; Legler JM; Warren JL; Baldwin LM; Schrag D
Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 17(8):584-90. PubMed ID: 17531502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Method for Performance Measurement Matters: Diabetes Care Quality as Measured by Administrative Claims and Institutional Registry.
McCoy RG; Tulledge-Scheitel SM; Naessens JM; Glasgow AE; Stroebel RJ; Crane SJ; Bunkers KS; Shah ND
Health Serv Res; 2016 Dec; 51(6):2206-2220. PubMed ID: 26846443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The formation of physician patient sharing networks in medicare: Exploring the effect of hospital affiliation.
Linde S
Health Econ; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 31657506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Administrative data algorithms can describe ambulatory physician utilization.
Shah BR; Hux JE; Laupacis A; Zinman B; Cauch-Dudek K; Booth GL
Health Serv Res; 2007 Aug; 42(4):1783-96. PubMed ID: 17610448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
