These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30488525)

  • 1. Facial masculinity is only weakly correlated with handgrip strength in young adult women.
    Hahn AC; Holzleitner IJ; Lee AJ; Kandrik M; O'Shea KJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Am J Hum Biol; 2019 Jan; 31(1):e23203. PubMed ID: 30488525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial cues to physical strength are not always associated with facial masculinity: Comparative study of Europeans and Southern Siberians.
    Mezentseva AA; Rostovtseva VV; Butovskaya ML
    Am J Hum Biol; 2024 Jan; 36(1):e23974. PubMed ID: 37548991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity.
    Windhager S; Schaefer K; Fink B
    Am J Hum Biol; 2011; 23(6):805-14. PubMed ID: 21957062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Men's facial masculinity: when (body) size matters.
    Holzleitner IJ; Hunter DW; Tiddeman BP; Seck A; Re DE; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2014; 43(11):1191-202. PubMed ID: 25638935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex difference in attractiveness perceptions of strong and weak male walkers.
    Fink B; André S; Mines JS; Weege B; Shackelford TK; Butovskaya ML
    Am J Hum Biol; 2016 Nov; 28(6):913-917. PubMed ID: 27387424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The morphometrics of "masculinity" in human faces.
    Mitteroecker P; Windhager S; Müller GB; Schaefer K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118374. PubMed ID: 25671667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associations among facial masculinity, physical strength, fluctuating asymmetry and attractiveness in young men and women.
    Van Dongen S
    Ann Hum Biol; 2014; 41(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 24555492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the interaction between partnership status and average progesterone level predict women's preferences for facial masculinity?
    DeBruine LM; Hahn AC; Jones BC
    Horm Behav; 2019 Jan; 107():80-82. PubMed ID: 30543820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnant Women's Preferences for Men's Faces Differ Significantly from Nonpregnant Women.
    Limoncin E; Ciocca G; Gravina GL; Carosa E; Mollaioli D; Cellerino A; Mennucci A; Di Sante S; Lenzi A; Jannini EA
    J Sex Med; 2015 May; 12(5):1142-51. PubMed ID: 25754377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does testosterone predict women's preference for facial masculinity?
    Marcinkowska UM; Helle S; Jones BC; Jasienska G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0210636. PubMed ID: 30811400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Average ovarian hormone levels, rather than daily values and their fluctuations, are related to facial preferences among women.
    Marcinkowska UM; Kaminski G; Little AC; Jasienska G
    Horm Behav; 2018 Jun; 102():114-119. PubMed ID: 29778461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No clear evidence for correlations between handgrip strength and sexually dimorphic acoustic properties of voices.
    Han C; Wang H; Fasolt V; Hahn AC; Holzleitner IJ; Lao J; DeBruine LM; Feinberg DR; Jones BC
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Nov; 30(6):e23178. PubMed ID: 30251293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Little AC; Boothroyd LG; Perrett DI; Penton-Voak IS; Cooper PA; Penke L; Feinberg DR; Tiddeman BP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Jun; 273(1592):1355-60. PubMed ID: 16777723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Body Composition Effects on Male Facial Masculinity and Attractiveness.
    Lei X; Holzleitner IJ; Perrett DI
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2658. PubMed ID: 30662423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual dimorphism and personality attributions of male faces.
    Pivonkova V; Rubesova A; Lindova J; Havlicek J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1137-43. PubMed ID: 21901645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of mating context and fecundability in women's preferences for men's facial masculinity and beardedness.
    Dixson BJW; Blake KR; Denson TF; Gooda-Vossos A; O'Dean SM; Sulikowski D; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2018 Jul; 93():90-102. PubMed ID: 29705577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.
    Lefevre CE; Etchells PJ; Howell EC; Clark AP; Penton-Voak IS
    Biol Lett; 2014 Oct; 10(10):20140729. PubMed ID: 25339656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lack of support for relation between woman's masculinity preference, estradiol level and mating context.
    Marcinkowska UM; Ellison PT; Galbarczyk A; Milkowska K; Pawlowski B; Thune I; Jasienska G
    Horm Behav; 2016 Feb; 78():1-7. PubMed ID: 26497247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial masculinity: how the choice of measurement method enables to detect its influence on behaviour.
    Sanchez-Pages S; Rodriguez-Ruiz C; Turiegano E
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112157. PubMed ID: 25389770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.