202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30488548)
21. Small-spot intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapies for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A dosimetric comparative study.
Liu C; Sio TT; Deng W; Shan J; Daniels TB; Rule WG; Lara PR; Korte SM; Shen J; Ding X; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):140-148. PubMed ID: 30328674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Feasibility study of fast intensity-modulated proton therapy dose prediction method using deep neural networks for prostate cancer.
Wang W; Chang Y; Liu Y; Liang Z; Liao Y; Qin B; Liu X; Yang Z
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5451-5463. PubMed ID: 35543109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comprehensive dosimetric study on switching from a Type-B to a Type-C dose algorithm for modern lung SBRT.
Zhou C; Bennion N; Ma R; Liang X; Wang S; Zvolanek K; Hyun M; Li X; Zhou S; Zhen W; Lin C; Wahl A; Zheng D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 May; 12(1):80. PubMed ID: 28476138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance evaluation of adaptive aperture's static and dynamic collimation in a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system: A dosimetric comparison study for multiple disease sites.
Grewal HS; Ahmad S; Jin H
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 33279369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Liu C; Yu NY; Shan J; Bhangoo RS; Daniels TB; Chiang JS; Ding X; Lara P; Patrick CL; Archuleta JP; DeWees T; Hu Y; Schild SE; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4755-4762. PubMed ID: 31498885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetric comparison of iPlan
Menon SV; Paramu R; Bhasi S; Gopalakrishnan Z; Bhaskaran S; Nair RK
Med Dosim; 2020 Autumn; 45(3):225-234. PubMed ID: 32001069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of different treatment planning approaches for intensity-modulated proton therapy with simultaneous integrated boost for pancreatic cancer.
Stefanowicz S; Stützer K; Zschaeck S; Jakobi A; Troost EGC
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Nov; 13(1):228. PubMed ID: 30466468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetric evaluation of photons versus protons in postmastectomy planning for ultrahypofractionated breast radiotherapy.
Oonsiri P; Nantavithya C; Lertbutsayanukul C; Sarsitthithum T; Vimolnoch M; Tawonwong T; Saksornchai K
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jan; 17(1):20. PubMed ID: 35093111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13512. PubMed ID: 34989458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Forward treatment planning for modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) employing Monte Carlo methods.
Henzen D; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Lössl K; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031712. PubMed ID: 24593716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Advanced proton beam dosimetry part II: Monte Carlo
Maes D; Saini J; Zeng J; Rengan R; Wong T; Bowen SR
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 7(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 29876310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of dose engine accuracy on the optimum dose distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans.
Soukup M; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):725-40. PubMed ID: 17228117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Density overwrites of internal tumor volumes in intensity modulated proton therapy plans for mobile lung tumors.
Botas P; Grassberger C; Sharp G; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035023. PubMed ID: 29219119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of common dental fixtures on treatment planning and delivery for head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.
Hu YH; Seum WCTH; Hunzeker A; Muller O; Foote RL; Mundy DW
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13973. PubMed ID: 36972299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Liu W; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Chang YH; Wen Z; Shen J; Stoker JB; Ding X; Hu Y; Sahoo N; Herman MG; Vargas C; Keole S; Wong W; Bues M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):523-533. PubMed ID: 26725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
