These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30489611)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance treatment after first-line induction treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Franken MD; van Rooijen EM; May AM; Koffijberg H; van Tinteren H; Mol L; Ten Tije AJ; Creemers GJ; van der Velden AMT; Tanis BC; Uyl-de Groot CA; Punt CJA; Koopman M; van Oijen MGH
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Apr; 75():204-212. PubMed ID: 28237866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.
    Zhang PF; Wen F; Zhou J; Huang JX; Zhou KX; Wu QJ; Wang XY; Zhang MX; Liao WT; Li Q
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jan; 22(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 31062173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 25691669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bevacizumab plus Paclitaxel versus Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine for HER2-Negative Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
    Wu Q; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Wang F; Li Q
    Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(4):153-159. PubMed ID: 32187596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bevacizumab Continuation Versus Treatment Holidays After First-Line Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Health Economic Analysis of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial (SAKK 41/06).
    Matter-Walstra K; Schwenkglenks M; Betticher D; von Moos R; Dietrich D; Baertschi D; Koeberle D
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Dec; 15(4):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 27117056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Su D; Wu B; Shi L
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incremental cost-effectiveness of the pre- and post-bevacizumab eras of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy in British Columbia, Canada.
    Hedden L; Kennecke H; Villa D; Johnston K; Speers C; Kovacic L; Renouf DJ; Peacock S
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 48(13):1969-76. PubMed ID: 22325838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Out-of-pocket payment and cost-effectiveness of XELOX and XELOX plus bevacizumab therapy: from the perspective of metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Japan.
    Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jun; 15(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 20198398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pertuzumab With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Compared to Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy in the Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the United States.
    Garrison LP; Babigumira J; Tournier C; Goertz HP; Lubinga SJ; Perez EA
    Value Health; 2019 Apr; 22(4):408-415. PubMed ID: 30975391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
    Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
    J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
    Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
    Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Markov model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of antiangiogenesis therapy using bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer.
    Minion LE; Bai J; Monk BJ; Robin Keller L; Ramez EN; Forde GK; Chan JK; Tewari KS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 137(3):490-6. PubMed ID: 25766118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of
    Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V
    J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.
    Simkens LH; van Tinteren H; May A; ten Tije AJ; Creemers GJ; Loosveld OJ; de Jongh FE; Erdkamp FL; Erjavec Z; van der Torren AM; Tol J; Braun HJ; Nieboer P; van der Hoeven JJ; Haasjes JG; Jansen RL; Wals J; Cats A; Derleyn VA; Honkoop AH; Mol L; Punt CJ; Koopman M
    Lancet; 2015 May; 385(9980):1843-52. PubMed ID: 25862517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
    Cho SK; Hay JW; Barzi A
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2018 Dec; 17(4):e751-e761. PubMed ID: 30228027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.