These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners. Zhang J; McPherson B Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Speech distortion measures for hearing aids. Williamson MJ; Cummins KL; Hecox KE J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 3430386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of adaptive multimicrophone algorithms for hearing aids. Chazan D; Medan Y; Shvadron U J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 3430370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Noise reduction in binaural hearing aids: analyzing the benefit over monaural systems. Srinivasan S J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):EL353-9. PubMed ID: 19206693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments. Kiessling J; Steffens T Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Improvement of hearing aid fitting with digital aids and new fitting strategies]. Schorn K; Baumann U Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Jan; 78(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10080122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids. Chung K; McKibben N; Mongeau L J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2529-42. PubMed ID: 20370035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of two-channel and single-channel compression hearing aids. Moore BC; Glasberg BR Audiology; 1986; 25(4-5):210-26. PubMed ID: 3566630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Responsible use of modern hearing aid technology. III: Improved speech discrimination in noise. Modern hearing aid technology in pediatric management]. Steffens T HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):403-14. PubMed ID: 9265027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A digital master hearing aid. Levitt H; Neuman A; Mills R; Schwander T J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 3959001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf. Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms. Nordrum S; Erler S; Garstecki D; Dhar S Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain. Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification. Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development of an ear-level digital hearing aid and computer-assisted fitting procedure: an interim report. Engebretson AM; Morley RE; Popelka GR J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):55-64. PubMed ID: 3430390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Design and evaluation of a two-channel compression hearing aid. Moore BC J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):181-92. PubMed ID: 3430376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]