These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3049657)

  • 21. Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria in a University Hospital Centre Split, Croatia in 2013.
    Novak A; Rubic Z; Dogas V; Goic-Barisic I; Radic M; Tonkic M
    Anaerobe; 2015 Feb; 31():31-6. PubMed ID: 25479237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Automated technics in microbiological diagnosis compared with conventional methods].
    Schmitt Y
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1986 Apr; 261(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 3526759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.
    Kelly MT; Latimer JM; Balfour LC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):902-5. PubMed ID: 7096560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of veterinary pathogens by use of commercial identification systems and new trends in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of veterinary pathogens.
    Watts JL; Yancey RJ
    Clin Microbiol Rev; 1994 Jul; 7(3):346-56. PubMed ID: 7923054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli in blood cultures by an electrochemical method.
    Huang AH; Wu JJ; Weng YM; Ding HC; Chang TC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Oct; 36(10):2882-6. PubMed ID: 9738038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility system with the autoSCAN-4 automated reader.
    Baker CN; Stocker SA; Rhoden DL; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 3700598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A simple and sensitive quality control method of the anaerobic atmosphere for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Justesen T; Justesen US
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2013 Jun; 76(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 23535206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Susceptibility testing with the sensititer breakpoint broth microdilution system.
    Doern GV; Dascal A; Keville M
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1985 May; 3(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 3922668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ability of laboratories to detect emerging antimicrobial resistance: proficiency testing and quality control results from the World Health Organization's external quality assurance system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    Tenover FC; Mohammed MJ; Stelling J; O'Brien T; Williams R
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 39(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 11136778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bacteriological findings and antimicrobial resistance in odontogenic and non-odontogenic chronic maxillary sinusitis.
    Puglisi S; Privitera S; Maiolino L; Serra A; Garotta M; Blandino G; Speciale A
    J Med Microbiol; 2011 Sep; 60(Pt 9):1353-1359. PubMed ID: 21498651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the MS-2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system: report of a European collaborative study.
    Johnston HH; Acar JF; Linzenmeier G; Visconti A
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):204-11. PubMed ID: 7173184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Schuetz AN
    Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Sep; 59(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 24867792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of two test-kits--API and Oxi Ferm tube--for identification of oxidative-fermentative Gram-negative rods.
    Nord CE; Wretlind B; Dahlbäck A
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1977 Jul; 163(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 331064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The in-vitro activities of enoxacin and ofloxacin compared with that of ciprofloxacin.
    King A; Shannon K; Phillips I
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 May; 15(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 3159712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of the E test for determining antimicrobial susceptibilities of staphylococci, enterococci, Campylobacter jejuni, and gram-negative bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents.
    Huang MB; Baker CN; Banerjee S; Tenover FC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Dec; 30(12):3243-8. PubMed ID: 1452709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the OSIRIS video reader system for disk diffusion susceptibility test reading.
    Sánchez MA; Sánchez del Saz B; Loza E; Baquero F; Cantón R
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2001 Jul; 7(7):352-7. PubMed ID: 11531979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial mixtures using agar dilution technique.
    Athar MA
    Am J Med Technol; 1980 Feb; 46(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 6986770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Identification and susceptibility testing for obligate anaerobic bacteria using a semi-automated API ATB plus system.
    Grollier G; Burucoa C; Bonnin M; de Rautlin de La Roy Y
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1992; 50(6-7):393-7. PubMed ID: 1492717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro activity of A-16686, a new glycopeptide.
    Neu HC; Neu NM
    Chemotherapy; 1986; 32(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 3757587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated identification and susceptibility testing system in clinical microbiology laboratory practice.
    Stefaniuk E; Baraniak A; Gniadkowski M; Hryniewicz W
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2003 Aug; 22(8):479-85. PubMed ID: 12884060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.