These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3049661)
1. Evaluation of a new latex test and a new enzyme immunoassay for determination of rubella immunity. Simor AE; Chua R; Low DE J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):1582-3. PubMed ID: 3049661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a new, rapid enzyme immunoassay with a latex agglutination test for qualitative detection of rubella antibodies. Ferraro MJ; Kallas WM; Welch KP; Lau AY J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 25(9):1722-4. PubMed ID: 3308952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition, and passive latex agglutination for determination of rubella immune status. Steece RS; Talley MS; Skeels MR; Lanier GA J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):140-2. PubMed ID: 3968201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in antibody responses with rapid agglutination tests for the detection of rubella antibodies. Chernesky MA; DeLong DJ; Mahony JB; Castriciano S J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Apr; 23(4):772-6. PubMed ID: 3517065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a simple latex agglutination test with hemolysis-in-gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay for detection of rubella virus antibodies. Väänänen P; Häivä VM; Koskela P; Meurman O J Clin Microbiol; 1985 May; 21(5):793-5. PubMed ID: 3998112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A sol-particle immunoassay for determination of anti-rubella antibodies; development and clinical validation. Wielaard F; Denissen A; van der Veen L; Rutjes I J Virol Methods; 1987 Aug; 17(1-2):149-58. PubMed ID: 3667854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test for screening antibodies to rubella virus. León P; de Ory F; Domingo C; López JA; Echevarría JM Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 7(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 3134214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of immune status in patients with low antibody titers for rubella virus. Fayram SL; Akin S; Aarnaes SL; Peterson EM; de la Maza LM J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 25(1):178-80. PubMed ID: 3539991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the latex agglutination method with the hemagglutination inhibition test in the detection of antibodies against rubella virus]. Cello J; Castaño G; Freire MC; Novillo AA Rev Argent Microbiol; 1987; 19(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 3503313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microtiter latex agglutination--quantitative and qualitative equivalent to hemagglutination inhibition for detection of rubella antibody. Mayo DR; Sirpenski SP; Markowski M Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 May; 5(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 3709094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New latex agglutination test for rapid determination of rubella immune status. Weissfeld AS; Sonnenwirth AC J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Nov; 16(5):971-2. PubMed ID: 7153349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Latex-agglutination test for rubella antibody: validity of positive results assessed by response to immunization and comparison with other tests. Storch GA; Myers N J Infect Dis; 1984 Mar; 149(3):459-64. PubMed ID: 6371155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of in vivo challenge to assess rubella immunity determined by haemagglutination inhibition and latex agglutination. Grangeot-Keros L; Badur S; Pons JC; Duthu S; Pillot J Res Virol; 1989; 140(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 2587849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rubella diagnostic tests: what is a significant result? Sever JL; Cleghorn C Postgrad Med; 1982 Mar; 71(3):73-7. PubMed ID: 7036120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with indirect hemagglutination and hemagglutination inhibition for determination of rubella virus antibody: evaluation of immune status with commercial reagents in a clinical laboratory. Truant AL; Barksdale BL; Huber TW; Elliott LB J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jan; 17(1):106-8. PubMed ID: 6338030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of serological methods for the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies to rubella virus. Arista S; Pistoia D; Titone L; Ammatuna P Microbiologica; 1987 Apr; 10(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 3587064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative study of 2 latex tests (rubalex and rubascan) with an immunoenzyme test (enzygnost-rubella) and a hemagglutination inhibition test for the study of anti-rubella antibodies]. Rescaldani R; Vigorè L; Viganò EF; Giltri G; Andreani G Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1986 Jun; 22(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 3823362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Cobas Core Rubella IgG EIA recomb, a new enzyme immunoassay based on recombinant rubella-like particles. Grangeot-Keros L; Pustowoit B; Hobman T J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 33(9):2392-4. PubMed ID: 7494034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus in selected sera. Freeman S; Clark L; Dumas N J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jul; 18(1):197-8. PubMed ID: 6885988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of two passive agglutination procedures with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for rubella antibody status. Pruneda RC; Dover JC Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Dec; 86(6):768-70. PubMed ID: 3788864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]