These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3049720)

  • 1. Fracture mechanics parameters for failure prediction of composite resins.
    De Groot R; Van Elst HC; Peters MC
    J Dent Res; 1988 Jun; 67(6):919-24. PubMed ID: 3049720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture-mechanics parameters of the composite-enamel bond.
    de Groot R; van Elst HC; Peters MC
    J Dent Res; 1990 Jan; 69(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2406304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure stress criteria for composite resin.
    De Groot R; Peters MC; De Haan YM; Dop GJ; Plasschaert AJ
    J Dent Res; 1987 Dec; 66(12):1748-52. PubMed ID: 3479474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods.
    Braga RR; Meira JB; Boaro LC; Xavier TA
    Dent Mater; 2010 Feb; 26(2):e38-49. PubMed ID: 20004960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture behavior of dental composite resins.
    Kim KH; Park JH; Imai Y; Kishi T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1991; 1(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 1842510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixed-mode stress intensity factors for kink cracks with finite kink length loaded in tension and bending: application to dentin and enamel.
    Bechtle S; Fett T; Rizzi G; Habelitz S; Schneider GA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 May; 3(4):303-12. PubMed ID: 20346898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture studies of selected dental restorative composites.
    Zhao D; Botsis J; Drummond JL
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 9758975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of specimen gripping device, geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode and stress distribution: laboratory and finite element analyses.
    Raposo LH; Armstrong SR; Maia RR; Qian F; Geraldeli S; Soares CJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):e50-62. PubMed ID: 22425572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture toughness determination of dental materials by laboratory testing and finite element models.
    Pidaparti RM; Beatty MW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Mar; 29(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 7615582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of mechanical properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental composite resins containing various mass fractions of silica nanoparticles.
    Hosseinalipour M; Javadpour J; Rezaie H; Dadras T; Hayati AN
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 19(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 19895426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of three testing methods of fracture toughness using indirect composite].
    Akiike S; Nose H; Hirota Y; Tawada Y; Komatsu S
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jan; 52(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 18292646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microstructural characterization and fracture behavior of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite.
    Rodrigues SA; Scherrer SS; Ferracane JL; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1281-8. PubMed ID: 18374408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of sources of uncertainties in microtensile bond strength of dental adhesive system for different specimen geometries.
    Ghassemieh E
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):536-47. PubMed ID: 17697706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of glass-fiber reinforcement and water storage on fracture toughness (KIC) of polymer-based provisional crown and FPD materials.
    Kim SH; Watts DC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 15237879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of interfacial fracture in dental restorations.
    Kotousov A; Kahler B; Swain M
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21824651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fibre reinforced composite dental bridge. Part II: Numerical investigation.
    Li W; Swain MV; Li Q; Ironside J; Steven GP
    Biomaterials; 2004 Sep; 25(20):4995-5001. PubMed ID: 15109861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system.
    Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Koike T; Yukitani W; Hisamitsu H; Wakumoto S; Fujishima A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 10823080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations.
    Thomaidis S; Kakaboura A; Mueller WD; Zinelis S
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):e132-41. PubMed ID: 23790281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.