234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30497389)
1. Improving the quality of reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
Xu C; Liu TZ; Jia PL; Liu Y; Li L; Cheng LL; Sun X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):157. PubMed ID: 30497389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the abstract reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analysis: a literature survey.
Jia PL; Xu B; Cheng JM; Huang XH; Kwong JSW; Liu Y; Zhang C; Han Y; Xu C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):148. PubMed ID: 31307388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey.
Xu C; Cheng LL; Liu Y; Jia PL; Gao MY; Zhang C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 30975073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting quality and statistical analysis of published dose-response meta-analyses was suboptimal: a cross-sectional literature survey.
Jiang Q; Liu Q; Chen F; Zeng X; Song F; Lu Z; Cao S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():133-140. PubMed ID: 31326542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The methodological quality of dose-response meta-analyses needed substantial improvement: a cross-sectional survey and proposed recommendations.
Xu C; Liu Y; Jia PL; Li L; Liu TZ; Cheng LL; Deng K; Borhan ASM; Thabane L; Sun X
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 107():1-11. PubMed ID: 30445166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An overview on the methodological and reporting quality of dose-response meta-analysis on cancer prevention.
Xu C; Liu Y; Zhang C; Kwong JSW; Zhou JG; Ge L; Huang JY; Liu TZ
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 145(5):1201-1211. PubMed ID: 30863898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist.
Li L; Xu C; Deng K; Zhou X; Liu Z; Busse JW; Ren Y; Zou K; Sun X
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():125-135. PubMed ID: 30278212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of surgical randomized clinical trials.
Yu J; Chen W; Wu P; Li Y
BJS Open; 2020 Jun; 4(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 32109006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement.
Nawijn F; Ham WHW; Houwert RM; Groenwold RHH; Hietbrink F; Smeeing DPJ
BMC Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 30744570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review.
Tan WK; Wigley J; Shantikumar S
Int J Surg; 2014 Dec; 12(12):1262-5. PubMed ID: 25448643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting.
Vásquez-Cárdenas J; Zapata-Noreña Ó; Carvajal-Flórez Á; Barbosa-Liz DM; Giannakopoulos NN; Faggion CM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):442-452.e12. PubMed ID: 31582116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines.
Ndze VN; Jaca A; Wiysonge CS
Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2836-2843. PubMed ID: 31166843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
Page MJ; Moher D
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
Ge L; Tian JH; Li YN; Pan JX; Li G; Wei D; Xing X; Pan B; Chen YL; Song FJ; Yang KH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():45-55. PubMed ID: 29111471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidemiology, methodological quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on coronavirus disease 2019: A cross-sectional study.
Chen Y; Li L; Zhang Q; Liu H; Huang Y; Lin S; Yin G; Xie Q
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Nov; 100(47):e27950. PubMed ID: 34964777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
