234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30497389)
21. Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines.
Toews LC
J Med Libr Assoc; 2017 Jul; 105(3):233-239. PubMed ID: 28670210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
Gao Y; Ge L; Ma X; Shen X; Liu M; Tian J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():214-227. PubMed ID: 31150834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review.
Willis BH; Quigley M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Dec; 11():163. PubMed ID: 22151233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review.
Downie LE; Makrai E; Bonggotgetsakul Y; Dirito LJ; Kristo K; Pham MN; You M; Verspoor K; Pianta MJ
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 136(9):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 29978192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.
Kelly SE; Moher D; Clifford TJ
Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():79. PubMed ID: 27160255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?-two systematic reviews.
Farid-Kapadia M; Joachim KC; Balasingham C; Clyburne-Sherin A; Offringa M
Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):31. PubMed ID: 28260528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement.
Lee SY; Sagoo H; Farwana R; Whitehurst K; Fowler A; Agha R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey.
Meursinge Reynders R; Ladu L; Di Girolamo N
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):249. PubMed ID: 29216930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience.
Maticic K; Krnic Martinic M; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):32. PubMed ID: 30764774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature.
Akhigbe T; Zolnourian A; Bulters D
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 May; 39():45-48. PubMed ID: 28246008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy could not be reproduced.
Stegeman I; Leeflang MMG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():161-166. PubMed ID: 32679314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist.
Wang X; Chen Y; Liu Y; Yao L; Estill J; Bian Z; Wu T; Shang H; Lee MS; Wei D; Tian J; Ma B; Wang Y; Tian G; Yang K
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2019 Aug; 19(1):208. PubMed ID: 31405367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reporting quality in systematic reviews of
Elshafay A; Omran ES; Abdelkhalek M; El-Badry MO; Eisa HG; Fala SY; Dang T; Ghanem MAT; Elbadawy M; Elhady MT; Vuong NL; Hirayama K; Huy NT
Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1631-1641. PubMed ID: 30977685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.
McGrath TA; Alabousi M; Skidmore B; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PMM; Moher D; Thombs B; McInnes MDF
Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 6(1):194. PubMed ID: 29017574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perspective on Systematic Medical Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Pepose JS; Foulks GN; Nelson JD; Erickson S; Lemp MA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 211():15-21. PubMed ID: 31811861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Meta-analyses (QUOROM)].
Urrutia G; Tort S; Bonfill X;
Med Clin (Barc); 2005 Dec; 125 Suppl 1():32-7. PubMed ID: 16464425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines.
Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Bossuyt PM; Boutron I; Hoffmann T; Mulrow CD; Shamseer L; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():60-68. PubMed ID: 31740319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
