These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30497632)

  • 1. A pilot program featuring formative peer review of faculty teaching at a college of pharmacy.
    Kumar P; Bostwick JR; Klein KC
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Sep; 10(9):1280-1287. PubMed ID: 30497632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supporting formative peer review of clinical teaching through a focus on process.
    Moon JY; Schullo-Feulner AM; Kolar C; Lepp G; Reidt S; Undeberg MR; Janke KK
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Jun; 10(6):771-778. PubMed ID: 30025779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The planning and implementation of a faculty peer review teaching project.
    Schultz KK; Latif D
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2006 Apr; 70(2):32. PubMed ID: 17149412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing faculty evaluations of student journal club presentations with student self- and peer evaluations during advanced pharmacy practice experiences.
    Helmer AM; Slater NA; Marlowe KF; Surry DW; McCoy EK
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2020 May; 12(5):564-569. PubMed ID: 32336454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A peer review process for classroom teaching.
    Wellein MG; Ragucci KR; Lapointe M
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(5):79. PubMed ID: 19777094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A curriculum review and mapping process supported by an electronic database system.
    Britton M; Letassy N; Medina MS; Er N
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(5):99. PubMed ID: 19214253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Follow-up assessment of a faculty peer observation and evaluation program.
    DiVall M; Barr J; Gonyeau M; Matthews SJ; Van Amburgh J; Qualters D; Trujillo J
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2012 May; 76(4):61. PubMed ID: 22611270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of Research and Scholarship Criteria Within Promotion and Tenure Documents of US Pharmacy Schools.
    Snider A; Hight K; Brunson A; Payakachat N; Franks AM
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2021 Mar; 85(3):7983. PubMed ID: 34283764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Educational Background and Academic Rank of Faculty Members within US Schools of Pharmacy.
    Assemi M; Hudmon KS; Sowinski KM; Corelli RL
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2016 May; 80(4):61. PubMed ID: 27293228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Colleague Development Program: a multidisciplinary program of peer observation partnerships.
    O'Keefe M; Lecouteur A; Miller J; McGowan U
    Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1060-5. PubMed ID: 19995168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current State of and Opportunities for Enhancing Peer Evaluation Practices Across the Pharmacy Academy.
    Morbitzer KA; McLaughlin JE; Henson B; Fassett KT; DiVall MV
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2022 Nov; 86(8):ajpe8887. PubMed ID: 34987069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current Status and Best Practices of Shared Governance in US Pharmacy Programs.
    Kennedy DR; Harrell TK; Lodise NM; Mattingly TJ; Norenberg JP; Ragucci K; Ranelli P; Stewart AS
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2020 Jul; 84(7):ajpe7281. PubMed ID: 32773821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-Observation and Peer Feedback as a Faculty Development Approach for Problem-Based Learning Tutors: A Program Evaluation.
    Garcia I; James RW; Bischof P; Baroffio A
    Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(3):313-325. PubMed ID: 28632009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Faculty peer review of teaching taskforce: A quantitative descriptive research study for the peer review process.
    Jenkins E; D'Aoust R; Elias S; Han HR; Sharps P; Alvarez C
    Nurse Educ Today; 2021 Nov; 106():105055. PubMed ID: 34304102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer-supported review of teaching: an evaluation.
    Thampy H; Bourke M; Naran P
    Educ Prim Care; 2015 Sep; 26(5):306-10. PubMed ID: 26808793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overcoming pitfalls: Results from a mandatory peer review process for written examinations.
    Wilby KJ; El Hajj MS; El-Bashir M; Mraiche F
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Apr; 10(4):423-426. PubMed ID: 29793702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact and Attitudes about Peer Review of Teaching in a Canadian Pharmacy School.
    Richard CL; Lillie E; Mathias K; McFarlane T
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2019 Aug; 83(6):6828. PubMed ID: 31507278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuous quality improvement and community-based faculty development through an innovative site visit program at one institution.
    Malik R; Bordman R; Regehr G; Freeman R
    Acad Med; 2007 May; 82(5):465-8. PubMed ID: 17457068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Creating a Peer Review Process for Faculty-Developed Next Generation NCLEX Items.
    Hensel D; Billings DM
    Nurse Educ; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 48(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 36730639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. There's got to be a better way! Introducing faculty to mid-course formative reviews as a constructive tool for growth and development.
    Blash A; Schneller B; Hunt J; Michaels N; Thorndike J
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Sep; 10(9):1228-1236. PubMed ID: 30497626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.