These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30497885)

  • 21. Reliability of motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation in four muscle representations.
    Malcolm MP; Triggs WJ; Light KE; Shechtman O; Khandekar G; Gonzalez Rothi LJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 117(5):1037-46. PubMed ID: 16564206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability of single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for the assessment of knee extensor muscle function.
    Temesi J; Ly SN; Millet GY
    J Neurol Sci; 2017 Apr; 375():442-449. PubMed ID: 28320184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
    Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of transcranial magnetic stimulation measures obtained at rest and under active conditions and their reliability.
    Ngomo S; Leonard G; Moffet H; Mercier C
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 22227444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of corticospinal activity on TMS-evoked activity and connectivity in healthy subjects: A TMS-EEG study.
    Petrichella S; Johnson N; He B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0174879. PubMed ID: 28384197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How reproducible are transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced MEPs in subacute stroke?
    Hoonhorst MH; Kollen BJ; van den Berg PS; Emmelot CH; Kwakkel G
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Dec; 31(6):556-62. PubMed ID: 25233245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in Motor Evoked Potentials Induced in Rats by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation under Two Separate Anesthetics: Implications for Plasticity Studies.
    Sykes M; Matheson NA; Brownjohn PW; Tang AD; Rodger J; Shemmell JB; Reynolds JN
    Front Neural Circuits; 2016; 10():80. PubMed ID: 27766073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differentiation of motor evoked potentials elicited from multiple forearm muscles: An investigation with high-density surface electromyography.
    Neva JL; Gallina A; Peters S; Garland SJ; Boyd LA
    Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 1676():91-99. PubMed ID: 28935187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing motor function in young children with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Narayana S; Rezaie R; McAfee SS; Choudhri AF; Babajani-Feremi A; Fulton S; Boop FA; Wheless JW; Papanicolaou AC
    Pediatr Neurol; 2015 Jan; 52(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 25439485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.
    Pellicciari MC; Brignani D; Miniussi C
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():569-80. PubMed ID: 23845429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A novel low-cost approach for navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Rodseth J; Washabaugh EP; Krishnan C
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2017; 35(6):601-609. PubMed ID: 29036851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation suppresses ipsilateral projections to presumed propriospinal neurons of the proximal upper limb.
    Bradnam LV; Stinear CM; Byblow WD
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 May; 105(5):2582-9. PubMed ID: 21389299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The minimal number of TMS trials required for the reliable assessment of corticospinal excitability, short interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation.
    Biabani M; Farrell M; Zoghi M; Egan G; Jaberzadeh S
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 May; 674():94-100. PubMed ID: 29551425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Convergence of flexor reflex and corticospinal inputs on tibialis anterior network in humans.
    Mackey AS; Uttaro D; McDonough MP; Krivis LI; Knikou M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):706-715. PubMed ID: 26122072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Motor evoked potential latency, motor threshold and electric field measurements as indices of transcranial magnetic stimulation depth.
    Roth Y; Pell GS; Zangen A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):255-8; author reply 258-9. PubMed ID: 19815456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automated TMS hotspot-hunting using a closed loop threshold-based algorithm.
    Meincke J; Hewitt M; Batsikadze G; Liebetanz D
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):509-517. PubMed ID: 26385012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of pulse duration in single pulse TMS.
    Rothkegel H; Sommer M; Paulus W; Lang N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1915-21. PubMed ID: 20444645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Repetition suppression in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potentials is modulated by cortical inhibition.
    Kallioniemi E; Pääkkönen A; Julkunen P
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():504-11. PubMed ID: 26427962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities.
    Schaworonkow N; Triesch J; Ziemann U; Zrenner C
    Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 30268710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.