176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30497908)
1. Comparison of mandibular index values determined from standard panoramic versus cone beam computed tomography reconstructed images.
Koseoglu Secgin C; Gulsahi A; Yavuz Y; Kamburoglu K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Mar; 127(3):257-264. PubMed ID: 30497908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of roof visibility of the mandibular canal between cone-beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiograph images as dependent on the cortical bone thickness of the mandible.
Ketabi AR; Zelka A; Lauer HC; Hassfeld S
Int J Implant Dent; 2021 May; 7(1):39. PubMed ID: 34002304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of experimental phantoms to determine the accuracy and reliability of mandibular cortical width measurements by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Hayashi Y; Ito M; Imanishi Y; Watanabe K; Matsumoto K; Arai Y; Honda K
J Oral Sci; 2020 Jun; 62(3):303-307. PubMed ID: 32522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of mandibular osseous changes using radiomorphometric indices by cone beam computed tomography in patients with End-stage renal failure versus normal population (Observational Study).
Mohamed EM; Abdel-Samad AM; Darwish RA; Dahaba MM
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2021; 32(2):455-467. PubMed ID: 35017340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography.
Neves FS; Nascimento MC; Oliveira ML; Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 18(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 23975215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the mandibular index on panoramic and cross-sectional images from CBCT exams from osteoporosis risk group.
Gomes CC; de Rezende Barbosa GL; Bello RP; Bóscolo FN; de Almeida SM
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Jul; 25(7):1885-90. PubMed ID: 24676849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the relationship between appearances of the lingual foramen on panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Isman O; Kayar S; Surmelioglu D; Ciftci ME; Aktan AM
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):205-211. PubMed ID: 32031095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity of mandibular posterior vertical asymmetry index in panoramic radiography compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lim YS; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):558-567. PubMed ID: 29602348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of cone-beam computed tomography as a predictor of osteoporosis using the Klemetti classification.
Alonso MB; Vasconcelos TV; Lopes LJ; Watanabe PC; Freitas DQ
Braz Oral Res; 2016 May; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 27253142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography for mandibular morphometry.
Tassoker M; Akin D; Aydin Kabakci AD; Sener S
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2019; 78(4):862-870. PubMed ID: 30888681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Demonstration of the accessory mental foramen using rotational panoramic radiography compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
Naitoh M; Yoshida K; Nakahara K; Gotoh K; Ariji E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1415-9. PubMed ID: 21382086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the visibility and characteristics of the mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography.
Sahman H; Sekerci AE; Sisman Y; Payveren M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 24451856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital panoramic radiography and CBCT as auxiliary tools for detection of low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women: a cross-sectional study.
Abdinian M; Milaei M; Soltani P
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):78. PubMed ID: 37308822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationships between third-molar juxta-apical radiolucencies and mandibular canals in panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images.
Kapila R; Harada N; Araki K; Sano T; Goto TK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 May; 117(5):640-644. PubMed ID: 24725991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is Panoramic Imaging Equivalent to Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Classifying Impacted Lower Third Molars?
Brasil DM; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Maria de Almeida S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 77(10):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 31075253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between CBCT and panoramic images of the morphology and angulation of the posterior mandibular jaw bone.
Çiftçi ME; Aktan AM; İşman Ö; Yıldırım E
Surg Radiol Anat; 2016 Apr; 38(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 26370261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography].
Liu S; Wen F; Chen H; Liu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandibular incisive canal in Han Chinese using cone beam computed tomography.
Kong N; Hui M; Miao F; Yuan H; Du Y; Chen N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 45(9):1142-6. PubMed ID: 27184354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A retrospective radiographic evaluation of the anterior loop of the mental nerve: comparison between panoramic radiography and cone beam computerized tomography.
Vujanovic-Eskenazi A; Valero-James JM; Sánchez-Garcés MA; Gay-Escoda C
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Mar; 20(2):e239-45. PubMed ID: 25549693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
