These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

742 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30497919)

  • 1. Contamination in Low Microbial Biomass Microbiome Studies: Issues and Recommendations.
    Eisenhofer R; Minich JJ; Marotz C; Cooper A; Knight R; Weyrich LS
    Trends Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 27(2):105-117. PubMed ID: 30497919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification and removal of contaminating microbial DNA from PCR reagents: impact on low-biomass microbiome analyses.
    Stinson LF; Keelan JA; Payne MS
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 68(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 30383890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
    Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis.
    Erb-Downward JR; Falkowski NR; D'Souza JC; McCloskey LM; McDonald RA; Brown CA; Shedden K; Dickson RP; Freeman CM; Stringer KA; Foxman B; Huffnagle GB; Curtis JL; Adar SD
    mBio; 2020 Jun; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 32518181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved yield and accuracy for DNA extraction in microbiome studies with variation in microbial biomass.
    Davis A; Kohler C; Alsallaq R; Hayden R; Maron G; Margolis E
    Biotechniques; 2019 Jun; 66(6):285-289. PubMed ID: 31124702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
    Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental metagenomics and ribosomal profiling of the human skin microbiome.
    Ferretti P; Farina S; Cristofolini M; Girolomoni G; Tett A; Segata N
    Exp Dermatol; 2017 Mar; 26(3):211-219. PubMed ID: 27623553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tracking down the sources of experimental contamination in microbiome studies.
    Weiss S; Amir A; Hyde ER; Metcalf JL; Song SJ; Knight R
    Genome Biol; 2014 Dec; 15(12):564. PubMed ID: 25608874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of kit, environment, and sampling contamination on the observed microbiome of bovine milk.
    Dean CJ; Deng Y; Wehri TC; Pena-Mosca F; Ray T; Crooker BA; Godden SM; Caixeta LS; Noyes NR
    mSystems; 2024 Jun; 9(6):e0115823. PubMed ID: 38785438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. De novo identification of microbial contaminants in low microbial biomass microbiomes with Squeegee.
    Liu Y; Elworth RAL; Jochum MD; Aagaard KM; Treangen TJ
    Nat Commun; 2022 Nov; 13(1):6799. PubMed ID: 36357382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microbiome applications for pathology: challenges of low microbial biomass samples during diagnostic testing.
    Selway CA; Eisenhofer R; Weyrich LS
    J Pathol Clin Res; 2020 Apr; 6(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 31944633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research.
    Kim D; Hofstaedter CE; Zhao C; Mattei L; Tanes C; Clarke E; Lauder A; Sherrill-Mix S; Chehoud C; Kelsen J; Conrad M; Collman RG; Baldassano R; Bushman FD; Bittinger K
    Microbiome; 2017 May; 5(1):52. PubMed ID: 28476139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing the Deep Terrestrial Subsurface Microbiome.
    Daly RA; Wrighton KC; Wilkins MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():1-15. PubMed ID: 30298244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.
    Dahlberg J; Sun L; Persson Waller K; Östensson K; McGuire M; Agenäs S; Dicksved J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218257. PubMed ID: 31194836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using strain-resolved analysis to identify contamination in metagenomics data.
    Lou YC; Hoff J; Olm MR; West-Roberts J; Diamond S; Firek BA; Morowitz MJ; Banfield JF
    Microbiome; 2023 Mar; 11(1):36. PubMed ID: 36864482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses.
    Salter SJ; Cox MJ; Turek EM; Calus ST; Cookson WO; Moffatt MF; Turner P; Parkhill J; Loman NJ; Walker AW
    BMC Biol; 2014 Nov; 12():87. PubMed ID: 25387460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sterile paper points as a bacterial DNA-contamination source in microbiome profiles of clinical samples.
    van der Horst J; Buijs MJ; Laine ML; Wismeijer D; Loos BG; Crielaard W; Zaura E
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1297-301. PubMed ID: 24135296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sampling, Extraction, and High-Throughput Sequencing Methods for Environmental Microbial and Viral Communities.
    Torres PJ; Kelley ST
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1712():163-173. PubMed ID: 29224074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
    Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
    BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical considerations for sampling and data analysis in contemporary metagenomics-based environmental studies.
    Staley C; Sadowsky MJ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():14-18. PubMed ID: 30287354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.