These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30498892)

  • 1. In proportion: approaches for displaying patient-reported outcome research study results as percentages responding to treatment.
    Tolbert E; Brundage M; Bantug E; Blackford AL; Smith K; Snyder C;
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):609-620. PubMed ID: 30498892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Picture This: Presenting Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Research Study Results to Patients.
    Tolbert E; Brundage M; Bantug E; Blackford AL; Smith K; Snyder C;
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):994-1005. PubMed ID: 30132393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Presenting comparative study PRO results to clinicians and researchers: beyond the eye of the beholder.
    Brundage M; Blackford A; Tolbert E; Smith K; Bantug E; Snyder C;
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 29098606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What do these scores mean? Presenting patient-reported outcomes data to patients and clinicians to improve interpretability.
    Snyder CF; Smith KC; Bantug ET; Tolbert EE; Blackford AL; Brundage MD;
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(10):1848-1859. PubMed ID: 28085201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding and preferences regarding risk communication during pregnancy: a survey to facilitate provider communication with patients.
    Ferguson M; Shapiro GD; McDonald SD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100929. PubMed ID: 36931434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making a picture worth a thousand numbers: recommendations for graphically displaying patient-reported outcomes data.
    Snyder C; Smith K; Holzner B; Rivera YM; Bantug E; Brundage M;
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):345-356. PubMed ID: 30306533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A powerful partnership: researchers and patients working together to develop a patient-facing summary of clinical trial outcome data.
    Ruzich E; Ritchie J; Ginchereau Sowell F; Mansur A; Griffiths P; Birkett H; Harman D; Spink J; James D; Reaney M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2024 Jan; 31(2):363-374. PubMed ID: 37341698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.
    Brundage MD; Smith KC; Little EA; Bantug ET; Snyder CF;
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2457-72. PubMed ID: 26012839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy.
    Albers EAC; Fraterman I; Walraven I; Wilthagen E; Schagen SB; van der Ploeg IM; Wouters MWJM; van de Poll-Franse LV; de Ligt KM
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Mar; 6(1):18. PubMed ID: 35239055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Presenting time-based risks of stroke and death for Patients facing carotid stenosis treatment options: Patients prefer pie charts over icon arrays.
    Scalia P; O'Malley AJ; Durand MA; Goodney PP; Elwyn G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Oct; 102(10):1939-1944. PubMed ID: 31101429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: a study of six presentation formats.
    Brundage M; Feldman-Stewart D; Leis A; Bezjak A; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):6949-56. PubMed ID: 16192583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Engaging stakeholders to improve presentation of patient-reported outcomes data in clinical practice.
    Smith KC; Brundage MD; Tolbert E; Little EA; Bantug ET; Snyder CF;
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Oct; 24(10):4149-57. PubMed ID: 27165054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk communication formats for low probability events: an exploratory study of patient preferences.
    Dolan JG; Iadarola S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Apr; 8():14. PubMed ID: 18402680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving an electronic system for measuring PROs in routine oncology practice.
    Wu AW; White SM; Blackford AL; Wolff AC; Carducci MA; Herman JM; Snyder CF;
    J Cancer Surviv; 2016 Jun; 10(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 26644190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial.
    Edwards A; Thomas R; Williams R; Ellner AL; Brown P; Elwyn G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):336-49. PubMed ID: 16860964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery: Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies.
    Stover AM; Tompkins Stricker C; Hammelef K; Henson S; Carr P; Jansen J; Deal AM; Bennett AV; Basch EM
    Med Care; 2019 May; 57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1():S92-S99. PubMed ID: 30985602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicating the results of randomized clinical trials: do patients understand multidimensional patient-reported outcomes?
    McNair AG; Brookes ST; Davis CR; Argyropoulos M; Blazeby JM
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Feb; 28(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 20065187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PRO-ONKO-selection of patient-reported outcome assessments for the clinical use in cancer patients-a mixed-method multicenter cross-sectional exploratory study.
    Schmidt H; Merkel D; Koehler M; Flechtner HH; Sigle J; Klinge B; Jordan K; Vordermark D; Landenberger M; Jahn P
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jun; 24(6):2503-12. PubMed ID: 26676238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of a web-based prostate cancer treatment decision aid on patient-reported decision process parameters: results from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial.
    Cuypers M; Lamers RED; Kil PJM; van de Poll-Franse LV; de Vries M
    Support Care Cancer; 2018 Nov; 26(11):3739-3748. PubMed ID: 29752528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.