These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30499082)

  • 1. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab) in Combination with Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    da Silva WC; de Araujo VE; Lima EMEA; Dos Santos JBR; Silva MRRD; Almeida PHRF; de Assis Acurcio F; Godman B; Kurdi A; Cherchiglia ML; Andrade EIG
    BioDrugs; 2018 Dec; 32(6):585-606. PubMed ID: 30499082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies combined with different chemotherapy regimens in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
    Sun H; Li Y; Su Y; Wu X; Zhou X; Han J; Li J
    J Evid Based Med; 2019 Nov; 12(4):300-312. PubMed ID: 31596544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilisation of systemic therapy options in routine treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia.
    Delahunty R; Lee M; Wong HL; Johns J; Mckendrick J; Lee B; Kosmider S; Cooray P; Ananda S; Desai J; Tran B; Tie J; Gibbs P; Wong R
    Intern Med J; 2020 Feb; 50(2):165-172. PubMed ID: 30887616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(25):1-49. PubMed ID: 23074403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomised phase II study of panitumumab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (WJOG 6510G).
    Sakai D; Taniguchi H; Sugimoto N; Tamura T; Nishina T; Hara H; Esaki T; Denda T; Sakamoto T; Okuda H; Satoh T; Tsushima T; Makiyama A; Tsuda T; Hosokawa A; Kuramochi H; Tokunaga S; Moriwaki T; Yasui H; Ishida H; Tsuji A; Otsu S; Shimokawa H; Baba E; Sato M; Matsumoto S; Ozaki Y; Shinozaki K; Tamagawa H; Goto M; Kadowaki S; Fujii H; Koh Y; Yamazaki K; Hironaka S; Kishimoto J; Boku N; Hyodo I; Muro K
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 135():11-21. PubMed ID: 32526634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
    Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
    Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No survival benefit from adding cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in KRAS wild type patients: a meta-analysis.
    Zhou SW; Huang YY; Wei Y; Jiang ZM; Zhang YD; Yang Q; Xie DR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50925. PubMed ID: 23226426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Hind D; Tappenden P; Tumur I; Eggington S; Sutcliffe P; Ryan A
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 May; 12(15):iii-ix, xi-162. PubMed ID: 18462574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
    Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
    J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Provide Limited Benefits for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Fan Q; Lv W; Xu Y; Dong Y; Xiang Z; Wang J
    Curr Pharm Des; 2020; 26(26):3171-3186. PubMed ID: 32067605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study-level meta-analysis of efficacy data from head-to-head first-line trials of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors versus bevacizumab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Heinemann V; Rivera F; O'Neil BH; Stintzing S; Koukakis R; Terwey JH; Douillard JY
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 67():11-20. PubMed ID: 27592068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Cetuximab and Panitumumab in the 1st Line Treatment of mCRC in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic.
    Sehnalová I; Říhová B; Němeček R; Kintrová K; Demlová R
    Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(4):288-293. PubMed ID: 31426645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of Primary Tumor Location on First-line Bevacizumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Snyder M; Bottiglieri S; Almhanna K
    Rev Recent Clin Trials; 2018; 13(2):139-149. PubMed ID: 29595113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which is false: oxaliplatin or fluoropyrimidine? An analysis of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody.
    Wen F; Tang R; Sang Y; Li M; Hu Q; Du Z; Zhou Y; Zhang P; He X; Li Q
    Cancer Sci; 2013 Oct; 104(10):1330-8. PubMed ID: 23822592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the Chemotherapy Backbone Impact on the Efficacy of Targeted Agents in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.
    Chan DL; Pavlakis N; Shapiro J; Price TJ; Karapetis CS; Tebbutt NC; Segelov E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135599. PubMed ID: 26275292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.