145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30499829)
1. Association of Iris Damage With Reduction in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density After Penetrating Keratoplasty.
Ibrahim O; Yagi-Yaguchi Y; Kakisu K; Shimazaki J; Yamaguchi T
Cornea; 2019 Mar; 38(3):268-274. PubMed ID: 30499829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term changes in corneal endothelial cell density after repeat penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with endothelial decompensation.
Hayashi K; Kondo H; Maeno A; Takimoto M
Cornea; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1019-25. PubMed ID: 23328699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Twelve-year follow-up of penetrating keratoplasty.
Ono T; Ishiyama S; Hayashidera T; Mori Y; Nejima R; Miyata K; Amano S
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 61(2):131-136. PubMed ID: 27885526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Much Progress Has Been Made in Corneal Transplantation?
Shimazaki J; Ishii N; Shinzawa M; Yamaguchi T; Shimazaki-Den S; Satake Y
Cornea; 2015 Nov; 34 Suppl 11():S105-11. PubMed ID: 26448167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial decompensation in eyes with buphthalmos.
Toker E; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Dietrich T; Naumann GO
Cornea; 2003 Apr; 22(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 12658082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Ten-Year Endothelial Cell Loss Compared with Penetrating Keratoplasty.
Price MO; Calhoun P; Kollman C; Price FW; Lass JH
Ophthalmology; 2016 Jul; 123(7):1421-7. PubMed ID: 27108095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-Term Corneal Endothelial Cell Counts After Penetrating Keratoplasty in Infants.
Elbaz U; Ali A; Mireskandari K
Cornea; 2016 Jun; 35(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 27055216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty.
Ing JJ; Ing HH; Nelson LR; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Ophthalmology; 1998 Oct; 105(10):1855-65. PubMed ID: 9787355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endothelial cell loss and graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty for laser iridotomy-induced bullous keratopathy.
Okumura N; Kusakabe A; Koizumi N; Wakimasu K; Kayukawa K; Kondo M; Mori K; Sotozono C; Kinoshita S
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 62(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 29766356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of donor diabetes history on graft failure and endothelial cell density 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty.
Lass JH; Riddlesworth TD; Gal RL; Kollman C; Benetz BA; Price FW; Sugar A; Terry MA; Soper M; Beck RW;
Ophthalmology; 2015 Mar; 122(3):448-56. PubMed ID: 25439611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome and Histopathology of Secondary Penetrating Keratoplasty Graft Failure Managed by Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Lavy I; Liarakos VS; Verdijk RM; Parker J; Müller TM; Bruinsma M; Binder PS; Melles GRJ
Cornea; 2017 Jul; 36(7):777-784. PubMed ID: 28350625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty.
Patel SV; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 139(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 15733993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of donor age and endothelial cell density on graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty.
Wakefield MJ; Armitage WJ; Jones MN; Kaye SB; Larkin DF; Tole D; Prydal J;
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 100(7):986-989. PubMed ID: 26567026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: survival, rejection risk, and visual outcome.
Mitry D; Bhogal M; Patel AK; Lee BS; Chai SM; Price MO; Price FW; Jun AS; Aldave AJ; Mehta JS; Busin M; Allan BD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 132(6):742-9. PubMed ID: 24763830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty under failed penetrating keratoplasty: visual rehabilitation and graft survival rate.
Anshu A; Price MO; Price FW
Ophthalmology; 2011 Nov; 118(11):2155-60. PubMed ID: 21906816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty.
Borderie VM; Sandali O; Bullet J; Gaujoux T; Touzeau O; Laroche L
Ophthalmology; 2012 Feb; 119(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 22054997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Descemet stripping automated endothelialkeratoplasty (DSAEK) versus repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) to manage eyes with failed corneal graft.
Khairallah A
Ann Saudi Med; 2018; 38(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 29419526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Graft rejection after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: graft survival and endothelial cell loss.
Li JY; Terry MA; Goshe J; Shamie N; Davis-Boozer D
Ophthalmology; 2012 Jan; 119(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 22115709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 1-year follow-up study of endothelial cell density loss after penetrating keratoplasty.
Draca N; Cović A; Pauk M; Pasalić A; Dekaris I
Coll Antropol; 2011 Sep; 35 Suppl 2():11-4. PubMed ID: 22220396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device.
Iverson SM; Spierer O; Papachristou GC; Feuer WJ; Shi W; Greenfield DS; O'Brien TP
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 38(1):223-231. PubMed ID: 28303370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
