153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30500094)
21. Clinical feasibility of mandibular implant overdenture retainers submitted to immediate load.
da Silva RJ; Issa JP; Semprini M; da Silva CH; de Vasconcelos PB; Celino CA; Siéssere S; Regalo SC
Gerodontology; 2011 Sep; 28(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20609008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Within-patient evaluation of chewing efficiency and maximum bite force of conventional dentures, fixed prostheses, and milled bar overdentures used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation of atrophied mandibular ridges: A short-term randomized trial.
ELsyad MA; Tella EAES; Mohamed SS; Mahrous AI
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 24(4):522-531. PubMed ID: 35679127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures.
Bryant SR; Walton JN; MacEntee MI
J Dent Res; 2015 Jan; 94(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25348544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Masticatory Performance and Maximum Bite and Lip Force Depend on the Type of Prosthesis.
Schimmel M; Memedi K; Parga T; Katsoulis J; Müller F
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(6):565–572. PubMed ID: 29084301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mandibular overdenture with a single implant in the canine region (c-SIMO): a feasibility study.
Maniewicz S; Curado TFF; Srinivasan M; Leles CR; Müller F
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):330. PubMed ID: 38772987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electromyography evaluation of masseter and temporalis, bite force, and quality of life in elderly patients during the adaptation of mandibular implant-supported overdentures.
Sônego MV; Goiato MC; Dos Santos DM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):e169-e174. PubMed ID: 27616640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of mandibular denture abstention on masseter muscle thickness in a 97-year-old patient: a case report.
Schimmel M; Loup A; Duvernay E; Gaydarov N; Muller F
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(5):418-20. PubMed ID: 20859556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does mandibular edentulous bone height affect prosthetic treatment success?
Pan S; Dagenais M; Thomason JM; Awad M; Emami E; Kimoto S; Wollin SD; Feine JS
J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):899-907. PubMed ID: 20708062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of maximum bite force on patient satisfaction and quality of life of patients wearing mandibular implant overdentures.
Geckili O; Bilhan H; Mumcu E; Tuncer N
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 21189081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Neuromuscular coordination of masticatory muscles in subjects with two types of implant-supported prostheses.
Ferrario VF; Tartaglia GM; Maglione M; Simion M; Sforza C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 15008934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Masseter muscle activity of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis, and milled bar overdenture used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation: A within-subject study.
ELsyad MA; El-Asfahani IA; Kortam SA; Mourad SI
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 33604996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
J Dent Res; 1999 Sep; 78(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 10512389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcome of implant-supported overdenture treatment--a survey of 58 patients.
Kuoppala R; Näpänkangas R; Raustia A
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e577-84. PubMed ID: 22616909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Functional adaptation of the masticatory system to implant-supported mandibular overdentures.
Giannakopoulos NN; Corteville F; Kappel S; Rammelsberg P; Schindler HJ; Eberhard L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May; 28(5):529-534. PubMed ID: 27001374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part IV: Comparisons of dietary intake.
Hamada MO; Garrett NR; Roumanas ED; Kapur KK; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Chen T; Levin S
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11174679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of implant-supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: a systematic review.
Fueki K; Kimoto K; Ogawa T; Garrett NR
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):470-7. PubMed ID: 18061741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of varying implant position in immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular overdentures.
Shaarawy MA; Aboelross EM
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 23339758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Effect of early-loaded small diameter implants retained mandibular overdentures on masticatory performance].
Liao XL; Pan SX; Feng HL; Kang YF; Peng D
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Oct; 45(5):798-802. PubMed ID: 24136282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
