These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30500960)

  • 1. Risk Factors and Maternal Morbidity Associated with Unintentional Hysterotomy Extension at the Time of Cesarean Delivery.
    Bligard KH; Durst JK; Stout MJ; Martin S; Cahill AG; Macones GA; Tuuli MG
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Aug; 36(10):1054-1059. PubMed ID: 30500960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unintended hysterotomy extension during caesarean delivery: risk factors and maternal morbidity.
    Giugale LE; Sakamoto S; Yabes J; Dunn SL; Krans EE
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Nov; 38(8):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 29565193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalad-caudad versus transverse blunt expansion of the low transverse hysterotomy during cesarean delivery decreases maternal morbidity: a meta-analysis.
    Pergialiotis V; Mitsopoulou D; Biliou E; Bellos I; Karagiannis V; Papapanagiotou A; Rodolakis A; Daskalakis G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):128.e1-128.e13. PubMed ID: 33894151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor.
    Sung JF; Daniels KI; Brodzinsky L; El-Sayed YY; Caughey AB; Lyell DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):306.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17826431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
    Merrer J; Dreyfus C; Girault A; Goffinet F; Le Ray C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258049. PubMed ID: 34597319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
    Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for uterine incision extension during cesarean delivery.
    Karavani G; Chill HH; Reuveni-Salzman A; Guedalia J; Ben Menahem-Zidon O; Cohen N; Elchalal U; Shveiky D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jun; 35(11):2156-2161. PubMed ID: 32580653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The association between nitroglycerin use and adverse outcomes in women undergoing cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor.
    Isquick S; Henry D; Nakagawa S; Moghadassi M; Thiet MP; Norton M; Lucero J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jun; 30(11):1297-1301. PubMed ID: 27405400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
    Dodd JM; Anderson ER; Gates S; Grivell RM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; 2014(7):CD004732. PubMed ID: 25048608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in outcomes between cesarean section in the second versus the first stages of labor.
    Vitner D; Bleicher I; Levy E; Sloma R; Kadour-Peero E; Bart Y; Sagi S; Aviram A; Gonen R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(15):2539-2542. PubMed ID: 29471705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk factors for classical hysterotomy in twin pregnancies.
    Osmundson SS; Garabedian MJ; Yeaton-Massey A; Lyell DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 125(3):643-648. PubMed ID: 25730228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abdominal Incision Selection for Cesarean Delivery of Women with Class III Obesity.
    Sutton AL; Sanders LB; Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Edwards RK
    Am J Perinatol; 2016 May; 33(6):547-51. PubMed ID: 26692204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple device prevents hysterotomy extensions during cesarean delivery for failed second stage of labor.
    Barrier BF; Allison JL; Andelin CO; Drobnis EZ
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 76(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 23711893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of cesarean delivery skin incision approach in morbidly obese women on the rate of classical hysterotomy.
    Brocato BE; Thorpe EM; Gomez LM; Wan JY; Mari G
    J Pregnancy; 2013; 2013():890296. PubMed ID: 24349784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysterotomy Extension at Cesarean Delivery and Future Uterine Rupture.
    Wilkie G; Shipp TD; Little SE; Fadayomi A; Carusi DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 137(2):271-272. PubMed ID: 33416283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of maternal outcomes from primary cesarean section during the second compared with first stage of labor by indication for the operation.
    Lurie S; Raz N; Boaz M; Sadan O; Golan A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():43-7. PubMed ID: 25218551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity.
    Hibbard JU; Ismail MA; Wang Y; Te C; Karrison T; Ismail MA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1365-71; discussion 1371-3. PubMed ID: 11408854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis.
    Saad AF; Rahman M; Costantine MM; Saade GR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):684.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24983682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery.
    Temming LA; Raghuraman N; Carter EB; Stout MJ; Rampersad RM; Macones GA; Cahill AG; Tuuli MG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):449.e1-449.e9. PubMed ID: 28601567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.