331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30501560)
1. Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm.
Risse S; Seelig S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1632-1645. PubMed ID: 30501560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
Risse S; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.
Schotter ER; von der Malsburg T; Leinenger M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):677-688. PubMed ID: 29999398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading.
Zhang M; Liversedge SP; Bai X; Yan G; Zang C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):812-825. PubMed ID: 31120302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study.
Niefind F; Dimigen O
Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1784-1798. PubMed ID: 27680711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
Schotter ER; Leinenger M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.
Degno F; Loberg O; Zang C; Zhang M; Donnelly N; Liversedge SP
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):453-474. PubMed ID: 30335444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
Risse S; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.
Drieghe D; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1701-1716. PubMed ID: 28967779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal.
McDonald SA
Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(26):4416-24. PubMed ID: 17045323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination.
White SJ; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Oct; 12(5):891-6. PubMed ID: 16524007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are eye movements and EEG on the same page?: A coregistration study on parafoveal preview and lexical frequency.
Milligan S; Antúnez M; Barber HA; Schotter ER
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):188-210. PubMed ID: 36107695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preview frequency effects in reading: evidence from Chinese.
Pan J; Yan M
Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2256-2265. PubMed ID: 35083499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.
Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1239-49. PubMed ID: 17853202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.
Veldre A; Andrews S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.
Inhoff AW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 2527961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
Kornrumpf B; Niefind F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1374-91. PubMed ID: 27167402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
