These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30501566)

  • 1. Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces.
    Kunze A; Summerskill SJ; Marshall R; Filtness AJ
    Ergonomics; 2019 Mar; 62(3):345-360. PubMed ID: 30501566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the driver-automation interaction: an approach using automation uncertainty.
    Beller J; Heesen M; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2013 Dec; 55(6):1130-41. PubMed ID: 24745204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing safety in conditionally automated driving: Can more takeover request visual information make a difference in hazard scenarios with varied hazard visibility?
    Huang WC; Fan LH; Han ZJ; Niu YF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107687. PubMed ID: 38943983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.
    Wright JL; Chen JYC; Barnes MJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29451105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agency modulates interactions with automation technologies.
    Le Goff K; Rey A; Haggard P; Oullier O; Berberian B
    Ergonomics; 2018 Sep; 61(9):1282-1297. PubMed ID: 29683404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.
    Roche F; Somieski A; Brandenburg S
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):839-849. PubMed ID: 30517032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures.
    McDonald AD; Alambeigi H; Engström J; Markkula G; Vogelpohl T; Dunne J; Yuma N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):642-688. PubMed ID: 30830804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.
    Miller EE; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30235014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.
    Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Closed-Loop Model of Operator Visual Attention, Situation Awareness, and Performance Across Automation Mode Transitions.
    Johnson AW; Duda KR; Sheridan TB; Oman CM
    Hum Factors; 2017 Mar; 59(2):229-241. PubMed ID: 27591207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech Auditory Alerts Promote Memory for Alerted Events in a Video-Simulated Self-Driving Car Ride.
    Nees MA; Helbein B; Porter A
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):416-26. PubMed ID: 26884437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting automation failures in a simulated supervisory control environment.
    Foroughi CK; Sibley C; Brown NL; Rovira E; Pak R; Coyne JT
    Ergonomics; 2019 Sep; 62(9):1150-1161. PubMed ID: 31179874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of automation trust in drivers' visual distraction during automation.
    Zhang Y; Ma J; Pan C; Chang R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257201. PubMed ID: 34520500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.
    Alrefaie MT; Summerskill S; Jackon TW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():180-190. PubMed ID: 31302486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.