These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30501909)

  • 1. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 3rd edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    Nurs Womens Health; 2018 Dec; 22(6):e1-e32. PubMed ID: 30501909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 4th Edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2024 May; 53(3):e10-e48. PubMed ID: 38363241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 4th Edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    Nurs Womens Health; 2024 Apr; 28(2):e1-e39. PubMed ID: 38363259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligent Structured Intermittent Auscultation (ISIA): evaluation of a decision-making framework for fetal heart monitoring of low-risk women.
    Maude RM; Skinner JP; Foureur MJ
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 May; 14():184. PubMed ID: 24884597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal heart rate auscultation: current and future practice.
    Feinstein NF
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2000; 29(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 10839579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using fetal scalp stimulation with Doppler ultrasonography to enhance intermittent auscultation in low-resource settings: a diagnostic trial from Tanzania.
    Goodman DM; Mlay P; Thielman N; Small MJ; Schmitt JW
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 30760224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consumer information on fetal heart rate monitoring during labor: a content analysis: a content analysis.
    Torres J; De Vries R; Low LK
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2014; 28(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 24781772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous electronic fetal heart monitoring versus intermittent auscultation during labor: Would the literature outcomes have the same results if they were interpreted following the NICHHD guidelines?
    Tommaso MD; Pinzauti S; Bandinelli S; Poli C; Ragusa A
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Sep; 28(9):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 31464110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.
    Alfirevic Z; Devane D; Gyte GM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; (3):CD006066. PubMed ID: 16856111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing.
    Devane D; Lalor JG; Daly S; McGuire W; Smith V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD005122. PubMed ID: 22336808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal health surveillance in labour.
    Liston R; Crane J; Hamilton E; Hughes O; Kuling S; MacKinnon C; McNamara H; Milne K; Richardson B; Trépanie MJ; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Mar; 24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. PubMed ID: 12196876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate during labor: an opportunity for shared decision making.
    Hersh S; Megregian M; Emeis C
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 24758413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA; Lake M; Schifrin BS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance: American College of Nurse-Midwives.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 26461195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in low-risk pregnancy during evaluation for possible labour admission - a multicentre randomised trial: the ADCAR trial.
    Smith V; Begley C; Newell J; Higgins S; Murphy DJ; White MJ; Morrison JJ; Canny S; O'Donovan D; Devane D
    BJOG; 2019 Jan; 126(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 30126064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maternity Providers' Perspectives on Barriers to Utilization of Intermittent Fetal Monitoring: A Qualitative Study.
    Chuey M; De Vries R; Dal Cin S; Low LK
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2020; 34(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 31996644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whither electronic fetal monitoring?
    Sandmire HF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1130-4. PubMed ID: 2234724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate: a review of general principles.
    Goodwin L
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2000 Dec; 14(3):53-61. PubMed ID: 11930379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.