These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30501990)
1. A robust alternative estimator for small to moderate sample SEM: Bias-corrected factor score path analysis. Kelcey B Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():83-98. PubMed ID: 30501990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias-corrected maximum-likelihood estimation of multiplicity of infection and lineage frequencies. Hashemi M; Schneider KA PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261889. PubMed ID: 34965279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data. Lee T; Shi D Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):466-485. PubMed ID: 33507765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When and how to use set-exploratory structural equation modelling to test structural models: A tutorial using the R package lavaan. Marsh H; Alamer A Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Nov; 77(3):459-476. PubMed ID: 38361388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes. Westgate PM Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Limited Information Estimator for Dynamic Factor Models. Fisher ZF; Bollen KA; Gates KM Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):246-263. PubMed ID: 30829065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model Implied Instrumental Variables (MIIVs): An Alternative Orientation to Structural Equation Modeling. Bollen KA Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 30222004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum ϕ -Divergence Estimation in Constrained Latent Class Models for Binary Data. Felipe A; Miranda P; Pardo L Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):1020-42. PubMed ID: 25724663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Best practices for your confirmatory factor analysis: A JASP and lavaan tutorial. Rogers P Behav Res Methods; 2024 Oct; 56(7):6634-6654. PubMed ID: 38480677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On random sample size, ignorability, ancillarity, completeness, separability, and degeneracy: sequential trials, random sample sizes, and missing data. Molenberghs G; Kenward MG; Aerts M; Verbeke G; Tsiatis AA; Davidian M; Rizopoulos D Stat Methods Med Res; 2014 Feb; 23(1):11-41. PubMed ID: 22514029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. More powerful parameter tests? No, rather biased parameter estimates. Some reflections on path analysis with weighted composites. Schuberth F; Schamberger T; Henseler J Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):4205-4215. PubMed ID: 37936011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests. Padilla M; Bickel DR Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel measure of effect size for mediation analysis. Lachowicz MJ; Preacher KJ; Kelley K Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):244-261. PubMed ID: 29172614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining multiple imputation with raking of weights: An efficient and robust approach in the setting of nearly true models. Han K; Shaw PA; Lumley T Stat Med; 2021 Dec; 40(30):6777-6791. PubMed ID: 34585424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of the log-normal mean. Zhou XH Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2251-64. PubMed ID: 9802182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data. Saha KK; Paul SR Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conditional estimation using prior information in 2-stage group sequential designs assuming asymptotic normality when the trial terminated early. Shimura M; Maruo K; Gosho M Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):400-413. PubMed ID: 29687592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What Causes the Mean Bias of the Likelihood Ratio Statistic with Many Variables? Yuan KH; Fan C; Zhao Y Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):840-855. PubMed ID: 30958035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias and Efficiency in Structural Equation Modeling: Maximum Likelihood Versus Robust Methods. Zhong X; Yuan KH Multivariate Behav Res; 2011 Apr; 46(2):229-65. PubMed ID: 26741329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]