These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30502777)

  • 41. EMERGENCE OF "DRIVERS" FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
    Castro Jaramillo HE; Moreno-Mattar O; Osorio-Cuevas D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(4):300-306. PubMed ID: 27691993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. PATIENT-CENTERED DECISION MAKING: LESSONS FROM MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR QUANTIFYING PATIENT PREFERENCES.
    Marsh K; Caro JJ; Zaiser E; Heywood J; Hamed A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 29277175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The impact of health technology assessment reports on decision making in Austria.
    Zechmeister I; Schumacher I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jan; 28(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 22233544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Health technology assessment and primary data collection for reducing uncertainty in decision making.
    Goeree R; Levin L; Chandra K; Bowen JM; Blackhouse G; Tarride JE; Burke N; Bischof M; Xie F; O'Reilly D
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):332-42. PubMed ID: 19394574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. INTRODUCTION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR MEDICINES IN SLOVAKIA.
    Tesar T; Hloska A; Wawruch M; Lehocka L; Snopkova M; Masarykova L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(3):345-349. PubMed ID: 28434416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Combining multi-criteria decision analysis and mini-health technology assessment: A funding decision-support tool for medical devices in a university hospital setting.
    Martelli N; Hansen P; van den Brink H; Boudard A; Cordonnier AL; Devaux C; Pineau J; Prognon P; Borget I
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Feb; 59():201-8. PubMed ID: 26705065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Health technology assessment and personalized medicine: are economic evaluation guidelines sufficient to support decision making?
    Husereau D; Marshall DA; Levy AR; Peacock S; Hoch JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Apr; 30(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 24806420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Problems of using modelling in the economic evaluation of health care.
    Sheldon TA
    Health Econ; 1996; 5(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8653188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Health technology assessment in Poland and Scotland: comparison of process and decisions.
    Kolasa K; Wasiak R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jan; 28(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 22617739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The Danish Health Technology Assessment model. A systematic review of Danish HTAs published by CEMTV from 1998 to 2004].
    Draborg EU
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(21):2074-8. PubMed ID: 16768927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. HTA and its legal issues: a framework for identifying legal issues in health technology assessment.
    Widrig D; Tag B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Dec; 30(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 25816824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Role of health technology assessment in shaping the benefits package in The Netherlands.
    Stolk EA; de Bont A; van Halteren AR; Bijlmer RJ; Poley MJ
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2009 Feb; 9(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 19371181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. STAKEHOLDERS' PERCEPTIONS OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN TURKEY.
    Ozturk K; Karadayı B; Şener O
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 29151380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. TOWARD INTEGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: THE NEED FOR EVALUATIVE FRAMEWORKS.
    van der Wilt GJ; Gerhardus A; Oortwijn W
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(5):586-590. PubMed ID: 29256849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Implementation of local/hospital-based health technology assessment initiatives in low- and middle-income countries.
    Attieh R; Gagnon MP
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Oct; 28(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 22995126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Budget impact analysis.
    Leelahavarong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S65-71. PubMed ID: 24964701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Identifying the Need for Good Practices in Health Technology Assessment: Summary of the ISPOR HTA Council Working Group Report on Good Practices in HTA.
    Kristensen FB; Husereau D; Huić M; Drummond M; Berger ML; Bond K; Augustovski F; Booth A; Bridges JFP; Grimshaw J; IJzerman MJ; Jonsson E; Ollendorf DA; Rüther A; Siebert U; Sharma J; Wailoo A
    Value Health; 2019 Jan; 22(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 30661627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. USING THE INTEGRATE-HTA GUIDANCE: EXPERIENCE FROM CADTH.
    Bond K; Weeks L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(5):591-596. PubMed ID: 29143698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Are adverse effects incorporated in economic models? An initial review of current practice.
    Craig D; McDaid C; Fonseca T; Stock C; Duffy S; Woolacott N
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Dec; 13(62):1-71, 97-181, iii. PubMed ID: 20018146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Editorial: Pursuing efficiency: a dead end for HTA?
    Jaime Caro J
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():S49. PubMed ID: 19523185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.