250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30503127)
1. The impact of using donor sperm in assisted reproductive technology cycles on perinatal outcomes.
Yu B; Fritz R; Xie X; Negassa A; Jindal S; Vega M; Buyuk E
Fertil Steril; 2018 Dec; 110(7):1285-1289. PubMed ID: 30503127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technology with donor sperm: national trends and perinatal outcomes.
Gerkowicz SA; Crawford SB; Hipp HS; Boulet SL; Kissin DM; Kawwass JF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):421.e1-421.e10. PubMed ID: 29291411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).
Declercq E; Luke B; Belanoff C; Cabral H; Diop H; Gopal D; Hoang L; Kotelchuck M; Stern JE; Hornstein MD
Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):888-95. PubMed ID: 25660721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance -
United States, 2013.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology.
Luke B; Brown MB; Wantman E; Stern JE; Baker VL; Widra E; Coddington CC; Gibbons WE; Ball GD
Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):744-52. PubMed ID: 24934487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perinatal outcomes of 221,709 singleton and twin pregnancies after the use of donor versus partner sperm.
Allen CP; McLernon DJ; Bhattahcharya S; Maheshwari A
Fertil Steril; 2022 Nov; 118(5):948-958. PubMed ID: 36198511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgically acquired sperm use for assisted reproductive technology: trends and perinatal outcomes, USA, 2004-2015.
Kawwass JF; Chang J; Boulet SL; Nangia A; Mehta A; Kissin DM
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jul; 35(7):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 29700730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
Okun N; Sierra S; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment.
Stern JE; Luke B; Tobias M; Gopal D; Hornstein MD; Diop H
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1438-45. PubMed ID: 25813277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paternal age over 50 years decreases assisted reproductive technology (ART) success: A single UK center retrospective analysis.
Morris G; Mavrelos D; Odia R; Viñals Gonzalez X; Cawood S; Yasmin E; Saab W; Serhal P; Seshadri S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Oct; 100(10):1858-1867. PubMed ID: 34405396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates.
Grimstad FW; Nangia AK; Luke B; Stern JE; Mak W
Hum Reprod; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2750-2755. PubMed ID: 27738114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of perinatal outcomes following frozen embryo transfer cycles using autologous versus donor oocytes in women 40 to 43 years old: analysis of SART CORS data.
Yu B; Vega M; Zaghi S; Fritz R; Jindal S; Buyuk E
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Nov; 35(11):2025-2029. PubMed ID: 30128819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of birth outcomes from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS): population-based analysis from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART).
Stern JE; Gopal D; Liberman RF; Anderka M; Kotelchuck M; Luke B
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):717-722.e2. PubMed ID: 27208695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
