These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3050356)
1. Quantitative flow measurements on phantoms and on blood vessels with MR. Meier D; Maier S; Bösiger P Magn Reson Med; 1988 Sep; 8(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 3050356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human abdominal aorta: comparative measurements of blood flow with MR imaging and multigated Doppler US. Maier SE; Meier D; Boesiger P; Moser UT; Vieli A Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):487-92. PubMed ID: 2649924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visualization and quantification of the human blood flow by magnetic resonance imaging. Boesiger P; Maier SE; Kecheng L; Scheidegger MB; Meier D J Biomech; 1992 Jan; 25(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 1733984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic model-based contour detection and blood flow quantification in small vessels with velocity encoded magnetic resonance imaging. Box FM; Spilt A; Van Buchem MA; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH Invest Radiol; 2003 Sep; 38(9):567-77. PubMed ID: 12960526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance measurement of velocity and flow: technique, validation, and cardiovascular applications. Rebergen SA; van der Wall EE; Doornbos J; de Roos A Am Heart J; 1993 Dec; 126(6):1439-56. PubMed ID: 8249802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation. Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The measurement of time-averaged flow by magnetic resonance imaging using continuous acquisition in the carotid arteries and its comparison with Doppler ultrasound. Tarnawski M; Padayachee S; West DJ; Graves MJ; Ayton VT; Taylor MG; Smith MA Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1990 Feb; 11(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 2182272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of velocity-encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modeling of steady and disturbed flow. Sun Y; Hearshen DO; Rankin GW; Haggar AM J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 1633398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative measurement of high flow velocities by a spin echo MR technique. Yi-gun L; Kojima A; Shinzato J; Sakamoto Y; Ueno S; Takahashi M; Higashida Y Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):217-22. PubMed ID: 1823395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for MR quantification of flow velocities in blood and CSF using interleaved gradient-echo pulse sequences. Ståhlberg F; Mogelvang J; Thomsen C; Nordell B; Stubgaard M; Ericsson A; Sperber G; Greitz D; Larsson H; Henriksen O Magn Reson Imaging; 1989; 7(6):655-67. PubMed ID: 2698430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-time Fourier velocity encoding: an in vivo evaluation. Macgowan CK; Kellenberger CJ; Detsky JS; Roman K; Yoo SJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Mar; 21(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15723365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow with a phase subtraction technique. In vitro and in vivo validation. Evans AJ; Iwai F; Grist TA; Sostman HD; Hedlund LW; Spritzer CE; Negro-Vilar R; Beam CA; Pelc NJ Invest Radiol; 1993 Feb; 28(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 8444566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Velocity profiles in the normal human abdominal aorta: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance data. Vieli A; Moser U; Maier S; Meier D; Boesiger P Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 2658233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Right and left lung perfusion: in vitro and in vivo validation with oblique-angle, velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Caputo GR; Kondo C; Masui T; Geraci SJ; Foster E; O'Sullivan MM; Higgins CB Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 1871279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of blood velocity and flow rates in the uterine vessels using echo planar imaging at 0.5 Tesla. Issa B; Moore RJ; Bowtell RW; Baker PN; Johnson IR; Worthington BS; Gowland PA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Apr; 31(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 20373437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance velocity measurements in small arteries. Comparison with Doppler ultrasonic measurements in the aortas of normal rabbits. Wendt RE; Rokey R; Wong WF; Marks A Invest Radiol; 1992 Jul; 27(7):499-503. PubMed ID: 1644547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When can Doppler be used in place of integrated backscatter as a measure of scattered ultrasound intensity? Schwarz KQ; Bezante GP; Chen X Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 7571131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blood flow volume quantification of cerebral ischemia: comparison of three noninvasive imaging techniques of carotid and vertebral arteries. Ho SS; Chan YL; Yeung DK; Metreweli C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Mar; 178(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 11856672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance flow measurements in real time: comparison with a standard gradient-echo technique. Klein C; Schalla S; Schnackenburg B; Bornstedt A; Fleck E; Nagel E J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 11536408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]